Search for: "United States v. Shine"
Results 281 - 300
of 363
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2011, 5:17 am
" According to the original and superseding indictments filed in Manhattan federal court: The original indictment, United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 5:17 am
" According to the original and superseding indictments filed in Manhattan federal court: The original indictment, United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 1:58 am
(IPKat) United Kingdom IPO changes wording of Patent Rules (Out-Law) Online design registration – latest news (IPKat) (IPKat) PCC Page 37: The Octopus – keeping documents up its sleeve (PatLit) Neatly wrapped: UDR in the PCC: Albert Packaging & Ors v Nampak Cartons & Healthcare (JIPLP) Perplexing perpetual protection (not Peter Pan) (1709 Copyright Blog) United States US Patent Reform Patent reform 2011: Vote scheduled at the… [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 8:23 pm
In addition, the United States' amicus brief also represents HUD's interpretation of the ILSA warranting Skidmore deference. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 2:00 pm
Supreme Court's recent decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 6:03 am
Path. et al. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 5:23 pm
” See: Gomes v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 9:41 am
See Weiss v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 10:52 am
A critical stage was defined in United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 4:27 am
Kurian – the Patent Office’s ‘knight in shining armour’ – resigns as the Controller General (Spicy IP) Reforming the patents & trademarks adjudication mechanism in India – Why does the Indian IP Bar continue to sleep? [read post]
17 May 2011, 9:47 am
Board of Education - one of the most important decisions ever handed down by the United States Supreme Court - illuminating the way forward. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 9:49 am
The United States Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 4:06 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 2:26 pm
I have no intention of discussing how the United States Supreme Court eviscerated the confrontation clause or even getting to the substance of the opinion itself. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 8:10 am
Randolph thus reversed the district judge’s ruling ordering the release of the petitioners—seventeen Uighur refugees from China—into the United States when the government failed to justify their detention or resettle them elsewhere. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Georgia United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 10:47 am
So a story in Menlo Park that's probably replayed daily throughout the United States. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 12:52 pm
In United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 2:16 pm
He’s saying he didn’t want to be President of the United States so he could stay home and be “Daddy”? [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]
