Search for: "United States v. State of Ill." Results 281 - 300 of 5,002
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2007, 8:40 am
In an order issued Jan. 17, 2007, our Indiana Supreme Court stated:A recent development suggests that the Supreme Court of the United States may soon revisit and address the application of the Eighth Amendment to claims that mental illness bars execution. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 1:46 pm
  Who smuggles coat hangers into the United States?! [read post]
  It is a question that has come before the United States Supreme Court on two prior occasions: When can a state require an out-of-state seller to collect and remit sales tax? [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 2:59 am
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that more than 76 million incidents of foodborne illness occur in the United States each year. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 12:15 pm
This was both unfortunate, and odd, since the United States Court of Appeals in the Ninth Circuit had previously held just the opposite.. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 2:19 pm by Rosalind English
What amounts to “positive action” will no doubt depend upon the circumstances of a particular case and, in some circumstances, the state may be required to take positive steps to prevent ill-treatment at the hands of others (see, e.g., R (Bagdanavicius) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] UKHL 38 at [24] per Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood, E v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary [2008] UKHL 66 at [44] per Lord… [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 8:25 pm by Bryan Ramos
In 2008, The Bureau of Labor Statistics found that almost 3.7 million nonfatal injuries and illnesses occurred on the job throughout the United States. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 10:00 am
The court in Madrid held, among other things, that prisoners with mental illness should be removed from the Security Housing Unit. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
United States, 880 F.2d 84, 86-87 (8th Cir. 1989).Kansas: Savina v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:12 am by CMS
The Supreme Court confirmed, as outlined in Soering v United Kingdom [1989] 11 EHRR 439, that the Divisional Court should have assessed independently whether substantial grounds existed for believing individuals sent to Rwanda would be at real risk of refoulement. [read post]