Search for: "United States v. State of Louisiana" Results 281 - 300 of 2,531
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2022, 12:00 am by Raymond G. Lahoud
Once again, immigration policy finds itself in the spotlight, as the United States Supreme Court recently heard oral argument for United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 11:03 am by Steven Boutwell
The Grand Palais was built as a riverboat casino and designed to sail on inland waterways of the United States and the state of Louisiana. [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Geopolitical tensions and strategic competition between the United States and China have increasingly influenced the investment landscape in recent years, implicating established regulatory frameworks such as that of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (“CFIUS”), as well as driving non-traditional government actors to take action. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 10:14 am by Jesse M. Coleman and David Hughes
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana recently held that, under the Defend Trade Secrets Act, 18 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 9:47 am by Eugene Volokh
Thomas Porteous, Jr., while a Federal judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, engaged in a pattern of conduct that is incompatible with the trust and confidence placed in him as a Federal judge, as follows: Judge Porteous, while presiding as a United States district judge in Lifemark Hospitals of Louisiana, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 1:50 pm by Daniel Bosch
In those states, including Louisiana and Texas, the pre-2015 rule is in effect in conformity with the Sackett decision. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 12:15 pm
Says lawprof Neal Kumar Katyal, who is representing the state of Louisiana as it seeks to reopen the Supreme Court case Kennedy v. [read post]