Search for: "United States v. Steven James" Results 281 - 300 of 454
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2020, 6:30 am by Mark Graber
Steven Skowronek describes a cyclical phenomenon when he observes that the United States experiences reconstructive, affiliated, and disjunctive presidents in regular succession. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 10:55 pm
") at 121 (Bristol Tennessee Police Department Individual Training Record for James Breuer); J.A. at 167 (Dep. of James J. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:11 am by Joshua Matz
In The Wall Street Journal (subscription required), Julia Angwin and Jess Bravin report on arguments made by the government in a GPS tracking case in the Ninth Circuit in light of the Court’s decision earlier this year in United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2025, 9:05 pm by renholding
New bank formation in the United States is at an all-time low, and Americans increasingly rely on non-bank financial technology companies (fintechs) to satisfy their financial services needs. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:11 am by James Romoser
At the Second Thoughts Blog from the Duke Center for Firearms Law, Daniel Rice examines the court’s “void for vagueness” doctrine and how it might relate to the Second Amendment, drawing on Justice Clarence Thomas’ concurrence in United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:04 pm by cdw
” [via LexisOne] FAVORABLE TO THE PROSECUTION OR EXECUTIONER United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 10:39 am by Larry Catá Backer
This paper considers societal constitutionalism in its dynamic element—as a system structures constant adjustment among the constituting elements of a governance unit (whether state, corporation, religion, etc.) [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 3:27 am by Russ Bensing
  I think there are 300 — perhaps there are 150 million workers in the United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 3:39 pm by Guest Author
Origin and Meaning of the Anti-Power-Concentration Principle In Seila Law v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Had one looked at this issue in 1921, the United States would have had company: At that time, Australia and Canada, countries that, like the United States, were influenced by the British tradition, provided judges with indefinite tenure during good behavior.[3]However, each of these countries amended their constitutions and adopted mandatory retirement ages for their federal judges later in the 20thcentury – 70 in Australia, 75 in Canada. [read post]