Search for: "United States v. Tam" Results 281 - 300 of 916
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2012, 7:10 pm by A. Brian Albritton
" I find this most recent announcement interesting only because it further shows the breadth of the False Claims Act and the different kind of industries and settings to which it can apply: anywhere there is a payment obligation to the United States, including as shown here, Customs' duties for imports.A. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 10:12 am
At issue in the case, No. 06-1269, United States ex rel. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 4:27 am
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 2:22 am
United States, 72 F.3d 447, 451 (5th Cir.1995); United States ex rel. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 8:01 pm by Reginald M. Jones
  Relevant here, the FCA allows a private plaintiff, known as a relator, to bring a qui tam action in the name of the United States against a violator. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 6:01 pm
United States, as mentioned here previously on the Whistleblower Law Blog. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 10:42 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Tam  (Trademarks) Petition for certiorari was denied in these four cases:Flute v. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 8:57 am by Unknown
United States Army Corps of Engineers (Dakota Access Pipeline)United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 4:44 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly:    At the National Conference of State Legislatures Blog, Lisa Soronen discusses the court’s recent decision to review National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 8:33 am by Ben Vernia
” The Court also found persuasive the government’s brief filed in relation to the petition for a writ of certiorari in US ex rel Nathan v Takeda Pharm N Am which had argued that the claim requirement was both “unsupported by Rule 9(b) and undermines the FCA’s effectiveness as a tool to combat fraud against the United States. [read post]