Search for: "United States v. Territory of VI"
Results 281 - 300
of 321
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V Extradition shall not be granted in any of the following circumstances: 1. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 9:02 am
ARTICLE VI. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
Article V(1) states that extradition shall not be granted for political offenses. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE VI If the person sought should be under examination or under punishment in the territory of the requested Party for any other offense, his extradition shall be deferred until the conclusion of the trial and the full execution of any punishment awarded to him. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 3:37 pm
ARTICLE VI Extradition shall be granted only if the evidence is found sufficient, according to the laws in the territory where the person whose extradition is requested is found, either to justify his trial or committal for trial if the offense with which he is charged or its equivalent had been committed in that territory or to prove that he is the identical person convicted by the courts of the requesting State. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE VI If the person sought should be under examination or under punishment in the territory of the requested Party for any other offense, his extradition shall be deferred until the conclusion of the trial and the full execution of any punishment awarded to him. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 7:43 am
The treaty was ratified by the President of the United States on February 21, 1934. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 8:11 am
Cuba's sovereignty over Guantanamo is an irrelevancy, as is the United States' lack thereof; it is de facto control over territory and individuals, not the right to exercise such control, that enables either the protection or the violation of the rights of individuals. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 7:09 am
Secretary of State for Defence, and Smith v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 11:35 am
(b) The occasional rendering of services in this state by a physician if the physician: (I) Is licensed and lawfully practicing medicine in another state or territory of the United States without restrictions or conditions on the physician's license; (II) Does not have any established or regularly used medical staff membership or clinical privileges in this state; (III) Is not party to any contract, agreement, or understanding to provide… [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 4:09 pm
In practice, UK freedom of speech rights are more constrained than, for example, in the United States, where even “hate speech” is generally protected under the First Amendment to the US Constitution (see Adam Wagner’s post on the Congressman Giffords shooting for more). [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm
In practice, UK freedom of speech rights are more constrained than, for example, in the United States, where even “hate speech” is generally protected under the First Amendment to the US Constitution (see Adam Wagner’s post on the Congressman Giffords shooting for more). [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 8:03 pm
Unfortunately, in the United States, the field of art history is largely a sham - and the lack of academic attention to provenance is endemic. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 5:32 am
When family rights are invoked, it is stressed, the state’s obligations to authorise family reunion in its territory will depend very much on the individual circumstances of the case. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 12:31 pm
Rather, I want to focus on the second holding, i.e., that a non-citizen outside the territorial United States must have substantial contacts with the United States in order to have standing to enforce constitutional rights. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 12:55 pm
In particular, there was no counterpart in PECUSA's Constitution to the Supremacy Clause in the United States Constitution. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 5:29 pm
” it is appropriate to start with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, promulgated by the United Nations General Assembly in December 1948. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 10:50 pm
The scope of protection is an autonomous concept distinct from and broader than Art 3 protection even as interpreted by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in NA v United Kingdom (Elgafaji at [33]-[36]; QD at [20], [35]); HH and Others) at [31]). [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 3:32 am
(See, e.g., Mendaro v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 7:47 am
Just click here to see the bills for a specific state. [read post]
