Search for: "United States v. Vigil" Results 281 - 300 of 547
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Shea Denning
Jeff Welty’s pithy explanation of the potential impact in North Carolina of the Supreme Court’s decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:00 am by Alessandro Cerri
 The First Defendant applied for International Trade Mark registrations (ITMRs) in respect of its logo and the word ICE, and these were registered at World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) on 18 June 2015 in respect of "floor cleaning machines" in class 7, based on an earlier registration in the United States. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 1:00 pm
While Judge Erdmann didn't tip his hand, Chief Judge Effron emphasized that accepting Army GAD's and the Navy-Marine Corps Appellate Government Division's arguments that CAAF had no jurisdiction would require overruling United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 7:47 pm by John Bellinger
… There’s no connection to the United States whatsoever. [read post]
3 Dec 2016, 6:28 am by Dean I. Weitzman, Esq.
Somers, nurse Lori Chambers, Main Line Hospital and United Anesthesia Services, the story states. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 1:36 pm by smiplaw
Abbot’s patent ‘551 was found to be unenforceable by the District Court, because Abbot failed to disclose to the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) a brief filed with the European Patent Office (EPO) regarding an earlier patent, U.S. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:52 pm by John Bellinger
   This morning the Supreme Court granted cert in DaimlerChrysler AG v Bauman, an ATS suit against Daimler. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:14 am by Scott Bomboy
The Colorado state supreme court didn’t accept Phillips’ appeal and his attorneys then petitioned the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 9:11 pm by Lyle Denniston
It has been nearly four years since the Supreme Court set off a constitutional revolution in the financing of federal elections, in Citizens United v. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 9:44 am by Arfaa Law Group
In 2015, the group released a report stating that one in five hospitals in the United States do not meet the group’s standards for accurately reporting when never events take place. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 10:02 am by John Floyd
  Within this due process safeguard (made applicable to the states by the Fourteen Amendment), the “right to remain silent” was born in 1966 in Miranda v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 12:43 pm by Donald Childress
The following response in our symposium on Kiobel v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 2:35 am
The direct implication of this is that the Court is very vigilant when interpreting provisions in the relevant directives – notably the InfoSoc Directive – and not particularly keen in tolerating national solutions that go astray from what the relevant body of EU legislation allows Member States to do. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 7:54 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The three-step screening we’ve developed across the United States, which includes county, federal and multi-state checks, has set a new standard.... [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 8:00 am by James O. Birr, III, Esq.
The Miller Act lawsuit must be brought in the name of the United States and filed in the federal district court where the project is located. 40 U.S.C. [read post]