Search for: "VILLAGE DEVELOPERS LLC"
Results 281 - 294
of 294
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2007, 9:38 am
., LLC v. [read post]
26 Aug 2007, 9:38 am
., LLC v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 9:29 pm
In In the Matter of 49 Wb, LLC v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 1:23 am
Village of Haverstraw, respondents
NEW YORK COUNTYCivil PracticeCourt Will Not Ignore Omissions of Requirements Without Explanation of Delay; Hearing Denied Szpakowski v. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 7:10 am
In July 1999, Ginsburg Development Company, Harbors Haverstraw, LLC, and related entities (hereinafter collectively referred to as Ginsburg), informally proposed to develop the downtown Haverstraw Hudson River waterfront through a "public/private redevelopment project. [read post]
23 Jun 2007, 7:07 am
In the case 49 WB, LLC v. [read post]
23 Jun 2007, 7:07 am
In the case 49 WB, LLC v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 11:32 am
In MiPro Homes, LLC v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 7:57 am
" (Indeed, though this is labeled the "Trump SoHo", its developer is a special purpose entity that is an LLC partnering Bayrock and Sapir. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 11:02 am
Madison Village, MHC, LLC - "Margaret Wilhelm rented a lot for her mobile home at Madison Village, MHC, LLC ("the Village"). [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 12:25 pm
"Absolutely, according to a decision by the Appellate Division, Second Department, in Matter of Rocky Point Realty, LLC v. [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 5:12 pm
NLRB Law Memo 10/09/2006 by LawMemo - World's Best. [read post]
19 May 2006, 9:32 am
Lake Grove Partners LLC, the owners of property within the zone complained that the new zoning precluded development of "Big Box" stores such as Home Depot and that the Village should have prepared a DEIS to look at the potential economic impacts of precluding such stores. [read post]
19 May 2006, 9:32 am
Lake Grove Partners LLC, the owners of property within the zone complained that the new zoning precluded development of "Big Box" stores such as Home Depot and that the Village should have prepared a DEIS to look at the potential economic impacts of precluding such stores. [read post]
