Search for: "Voter v. Voter" Results 281 - 300 of 6,668
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Topics include “Poll tax litigations and campaign information; Richmond Crusade For Voters literature and training materials; Prince Hall Fraternal Order of Black Freemasonry documents; Massive Resistance and the Byrd Machine; Interstate Highway System family displacement records; [and] Brown v. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 5:46 am by jonathanturley
Here are the opinions: 20231114 Opin Ord – LaBrant et al v Benson 20231114 Opin Ord – Trump v Benson   [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 3:24 pm by Dennis Aftergut
Voters have consistently rebelled against the Supreme Court’s June 2022 Dobbs decision overturning Roe v. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The judge ruled in June there is nothing unconstitutional about the voter-approved measure designed to prohibit “dark money” in campaigns. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm by Brian Connor
Supreme Court’s 2019 Weyerhaeuser v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 7:28 pm by Family Law
From CNN: Ohio will become the latest state to enshrine reproductive rights in its state constitution, CNN projects, continuing a winning trend for abortion rights advocates since the overturning of Roe v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 10:25 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  They want to use the "need" to cut benefits as a way to convince voters to support ending Social Security and Medicare entirely.Beyond that, however, so what? [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 5:00 am
Assn. v M.https://nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2023/2023_04835.htm [read post]
Brazil soccer game, $2,068 at a 2018 NFL game, $1,413 at a 2019 concert event, $2,856 at 2019 USA v. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 6:10 am by Unknown
The bill, Ending Corporate Influence on Elections Act of 2023, would “begin to undo” the Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 9:02 pm by Dan Flynn
  “Second, a plaintiff can demonstrate that the law violates the balancing test the Supreme Court announced in Pike v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Marshall saw it as a broad and sweeping power granted to chief executives so they could act mercifully.That case, United States v. [read post]