Search for: "WASHINGTON v. UNITED STATES" Results 281 - 300 of 10,023
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2021, 5:04 am by INFORRM
United States Attorney General Merrick Garland has moved to represent Donald Trump in Jean E Carroll’s rape allegations against the former President. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 10:40 am by Kate Fort
Whether Police Officers, Employed by the Puyallup Indian Tribe, But Trained, Certified, and Cross-Commissioned by the State of Washington, and Armed, Equipped, and Provisioned by the United States, Are Subject to the Constitution, U.S. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 11:56 am by Albert Wan
One year later, the United States Supreme Court decided Padilla v. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 5:18 am
Following a successful motion to change venue to Spokane, Washington, the defendants moved for summary judgment based on the so-called “two dismissal” rule found in Washington CR 41(a)(4), which provides “[u]nless otherwise stated in the order of dismissal, the dismissal is without prejudice, except that an order of dismissal operates as an adjudication upon the merits when obtained by a plaintiff who has once dismissed an action based on or… [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 10:57 am by Venkat
The Washington Supreme Court previously rejected a dormant commerce clause challenge to Washington state spam laws (See State v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 2:53 am by Walter Olson
Bauman, 2014) setting limits to state court jurisdiction. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 12:05 pm by Torsten M. Kracht and Rachel E. Mossman
Those cases were consolidated in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in In re Facebook Biometric Information Privacy Litigation, 3:15-cv-03747 (Aug. 2015) and are currently stayed pending the Ninth Circuit’s review of Robins v. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 7:48 pm
It appears President Bush has approved the death sentence in United States v. [read post]
In February 2017, the Washington Supreme Court ruled that a florist who refused to provide services for a same-sex wedding broke the state’s antidiscrimination law, even though she claimed doing so would violate her religious beliefs (Washington v. [read post]