Search for: "WEEKS v. DAVIS"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,975
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
LXBN This Week Ep. 3: Facebook’s IPO, Oracle v. Google, POM’s “Juice Wars” and U.S. v. Roger Clemens
29 May 2012, 4:26 pm
In this week’s episode, they discuss the many different angles on Facebook’s big initial public offering, the big Oracle/Google battle over Android, POM Wonderful v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 7:11 am
In anticipation of the filing of the petition, this week SCOTUSblog will be featuring commentary on such topics as the likelihood that the Court will grant certiorari, how last Term’s decision in Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 5:05 pm
Notable results include: A Petition for Review was denied in Davis v. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 12:50 am
After all, Marbury v. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 2:31 pm
The Court's 82-page list of orders on pending cases contained no word on Troy Anthony Davis' appeal, Davis v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 2:09 pm
In Obergefell v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 5:41 pm
This afternoon Judge Davis issued his rulings resolving the assorted postverdict motions in Clear With Computers v. [read post]
20 Dec 2006, 9:16 am
Another example this week comes from Judge Avern Cohn in United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 7:11 am
We've had some very popular posts this week, and excellent content as always coming from our member firms. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 6:49 am
See also Davis v. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 1:42 pm
Davis, 2016 U.S. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 3:46 pm
It will likely come on Monday, Wednesday, or Thursday of next week.... [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 6:13 am
Last week a federal district judge in Kentucky sent county clerk Kim Davis, to jail after she continued to refuse to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples even after the Court declined to stay a federal judge’s ruling ordering her to do so. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 9:03 am
Listen: Parental Support This week on Hull on Estates, Paul Trudelle and Sharon Davis discuss filial responsibility or parental support. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 5:42 am
They know that their employer makes them take calls on their lunch break, or will call them back to work without punching in, or the time clock automatically deducts a set amount of time even when a break was not as long as the automatic deduction - but the employees often don't track exact dates and times.In Davis v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 10:00 am
Last week I interviewed Jack Greenberg, one of the team of lawyers who argued the famous Brown v. [read post]
23 May 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court earlier this week, City of Arlington, Texas v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 8:56 am
On to the roundup - because it's been so busy this week, I'm going with a top 5! [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 9:01 pm
As noted a week ago here, Mapp v. [read post]
