Search for: "WHITE v. GROUNDS" Results 281 - 300 of 3,775
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2023, 4:36 am by Peter J. Sluka
  Not according to a recent decision from the California Appellate Courts, Crane v R. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 6:00 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The state court case was removed to federal court on diversity grounds and the Second Circuit had to determine whether Trump's allegedly defamatory comments were made within the scope of his employment as President of the United States.The case is Carroll v. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 6:36 pm by Josh Blackman
He then invited Maureen Scalia to the unveiling of the Gorsuch nomination and to subsequent judicial investitures at the White House. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
That was certainly true of the recent Supreme Court oral argument in Counterman v. [read post]
Yes, constitutional law has been used to oppress Native people, but at the same time, we want to bring to the fore how Native arguments led, for example, to seminal cases such as Worcester v. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
It owes no duty to check what visitors are saying to each other while strolling in the grounds. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 7:35 am by Cyberleagle
It owes no duty to check what visitors are saying to each other while strolling in the grounds. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 3:48 am by Seán Binder
Police said they fatally shot the suspect, a 25-year-old white man employed at the bank. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 5:01 am by Lee Kovarsky
States attach consequences to federal convictions all the time—making them elements of other crimes, sentencing enhancements, or grounds for bar discipline. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am by INFORRM
On the same day, the UK government published the AI White Paper, designed to guide the use of artificial intelligence in the UK, drive responsible innovation and maintain public trust in revolutionary technology. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
If you just blithely ignore it, and publish the story despite having been told that it may well be mistaken, that would be textbook "reckless disregard," which would allow liability even in a public official case: Consider, for instance, Harte-Hanks Communications, Inc. v. [read post]