Search for: "WHITING v. UNITED STATES ARMY" Results 281 - 300 of 369
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2011, 10:36 am by Jasmine Joseph
The other amendments of the United States Constitution's Bill of Rights inspire public adoration and volumes of legal research. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 11:39 pm by David Kopel
  Standing Armies, Militias, and Individual Rights—The Constitutional Convention of 1787B. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 7:21 pm by Big Tent Democrat
He is Commander-in-chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the militia of the several States when called into the actual service of the United States. [read post]
29 May 2011, 9:30 am by J. Gordon Hylton
  Although the Lockport team was affiliated with the American League’s Chicago White Sox, it appears that Kowalski signed with the Lockport team, rather than the White Sox. [read post]
29 May 2011, 5:52 am by thejaghunter
  Image link above ~~~~~~~~~~ Attack on Pearl Harbor, December 7, 1941 Click on underlined “hot-links” Cemetery Watchmen Ashes found in trash led to proper burial LISTEN, REFLECT, and PRAY MANSIONS OF THE LORD – United States Military Academy Mens Glee Club THE NAVY HYMN – United States Naval Academy Mens Glee Club ECHO TAPS – United States Marine Corps Band ~~~~~~~~~~ Captain William Edward Nordeen,… [read post]
17 May 2011, 5:42 am by Mandelman
LEARN IT, LIVE IT, LOVE IT SECURITIZATION The History of Financial Regulation in the United States What is Securitization? [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:43 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Baseball’s antitrust exemption, first recognized in the United States Supreme Court’s 1922 Federal Baseball Club v. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am by Charon QC
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 2:20 am by Adam Wagner
The debate over judges’ prejudices is still much more alive in the United States than it is here, but that doesn’t mean we should continue to ignore it, particularly after the passing of the Human Rights Act which means courts are ruling on increasingly sensitive social issues. [read post]