Search for: "WOODS v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE" Results 281 - 300 of 368
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2010, 2:41 am by sally
Supreme Court Cadder v Her Majesty’s Advocate (Scotland) [2010] UKSC 43 (26 October 2010) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Constantine, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 2406 (26 October 2010) T, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 2439 (26 October 2010) Wakeling, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 2210 (15 September 2010) Qayum, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 2237 (16 September 2010) Cooper, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 2335 (20 September 2010) Nuthoo, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 2383… [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 11:01 pm by Mark Bennett
At Balkinization, guest blogger Sharon Dolovich explains why the Supreme Court’s Farmer v. [read post]
18 Sep 2010, 9:49 am by Marta Requejo
Royal Dutch Petroleum (issued today by a 2nd Circuit panel of Judge Cabranes writing for himself and Judge Wood, and a concurrence in the judgment by Judge Leval). [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 8:20 pm by Kenneth Anderson
(Kenneth Anderson) I’ve now had a chance to read a little more closely the decision, majority and concurrence, in Kiobel v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 7:49 pm by Kenneth Anderson
by Kenneth Anderson I’ve now had a chance to read a little more closely the decision, majority and concurrence, in Kiobel v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm by Steven M. Taber
Department of Justice News Release, August 10, 2010 A comprehensive settlement has been reached with the City and County of Honolulu that will address Clean Water Act compliance at Honolulu’s wastewater collection and treatment systems, the Justice Department, U.S. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 3:23 pm by Mark Murakami
More when we publish, but as a hook to grab your interest, a Justice Scalia quote: Justice Breyer must either (a) grapple with the artificial question of what would constitute a judicial taking if there were such a thing as a judicial taking (reminiscent of the perplexing question how much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?) [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 12:46 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Here's an excerpt from the Introduction to the article: Justice Breyer must either (a) grapple with the artificial question of what would constitute a judicial taking if there were such a thing as a judicial taking (reminiscent of the perplexing question how much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?) [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 12:33 pm by Steven M. Gursten
What makes this decision remarkable is that it strips away the improper judge-made law that was created by four Republican justices in Kreiner v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am by Steven M. Taber
/Champion Chemical Company Superfund Site in Marlboro Township, N.J., the Department of Justice and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced today. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 8:56 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Gnango, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 1691 (26 July 2010) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) LK v Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust [2010] EWHC 1928 (QB) (15 July 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) Wood v Director of Public Prosecutions [2010] EWHC 1769 (Admin) (30 June 2010) Nursing and Midwifery Council v Okon- Burgess [2010] EWHC 1816 (Admin) (05 July 2010) Medical Justice, R (on the… [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 4:10 pm by Ted Frank
The trial lawyers were able to trick the Tellez v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 8:02 pm by Carter Ruml
 The breadth of the opinion concerned Justices Breyer, Ginsburg, and Sotomayor (their dissent is here). [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 3:23 am
Accordingly, said the Court of Appeals, “we cannot conclude that the penalty of dismissal imposed . . . shocks the judicial conscience as a matter of law,” citing a number of decisions, including Matter of Will v Frontier Central School District Board. of Education. 97 NY2d 690, and Matter of Pell v Board of Education, 34 NY2d 222.The court observed that: “The Appellate Division has no discretionary authority or interest of justice jurisdiction in this… [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 5:32 pm by legalinformatics
Professor LeiLani Nishime of the University of Washington Department of Communication presented a paper entitled Plessy v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am by Steven M. Taber
Department of Justice Press Release, June 2, 2010 A Colorado couple pleaded guilty in a Denver federal court to charges related to the illegal trapping and interstate sale of bobcats, the Justice Department announced today. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am by smtaber
Department of Justice Press Release, June 2, 2010 The Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities (ADOT) has agreed to pay nearly $1 million to resolve allegations that it violated the Clean Water Act at numerous sites in Alaska, the Justice Department and U.S. [read post]