Search for: "Washington v. Com." Results 281 - 300 of 338
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2009, 3:39 am
  In State v. [read post]
11 May 2009, 3:47 am
Washington to lab reports. [read post]
4 May 2009, 3:23 am
  In Morris v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 3:25 am
Washington applies to laboratory reports, which I discussed here. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 3:33 am
Washington, which radically changed Confrontation Clause jurisprudence. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 3:45 am
Washington, an argument that the court acknowledges its 2007 decision in State v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 5:03 pm
But many states operate under statutory schemes, or common law schemes bounded by statute, that limit full application of strict liability to manufacturers.12 For example, the Washington Product Liability Act (WPLA) applies strict liability to manufacturers but leaves non-manufacturing sellers liable only for negligence.13 Other states employ “pass through” statutes that limit the liability of sellers who do not exercise control over a product, so long as the seller can… [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 6:33 pm
But many states operate under statutory schemes, or common law schemes bounded by statute, that limit full application of strict liability to manufacturers.12 For example, the Washington Product Liability Act (WPLA) applies strict liability to manufacturers but leaves non-manufacturing sellers liable only for negligence.13 Other states employ “pass through” statutes that limit the liability of sellers who do not exercise control over a product, so long as the seller can… [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 3:34 am
  In State v. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 3:45 am
Three years ago, in State v. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 3:23 am
  In State v. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 10:42 am
  Sprinkled among them  was Patterson v. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 2:12 am
(Techdirt) Halliburton tries to patent form of patent trolling (Techdirt) (I/P Updates)(Law360) From 15 September, committing any crime can result in revocation of ‘privilege’ to prosecute before USPTO (Patent Prospector) USPTO to increase PCT transmittal and search fees (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Law360) US Patents – Decisions Questions of fact re alleged enjoined imitations prevent contempt: Liquid Dynamics Corp v Vaughan (Chicago Intellectual… [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 11:44 am
Four years after Crawford v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 6:04 am
(The network teamed up with the Washington DC firm New Media Strategies to create its convention hub.) [read post]