Search for: "Washington v. US et al" Results 281 - 300 of 1,116
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2018, 10:40 am by Chinmayi Sharma
The “tens of thousands of documents and emails” obtained were exfiltrated from servers in Virginia and Washington D.C. for the purposes of “destabilizing the U.S. political environment, denigrating the Democratic presidential nominee, and supporting the campaign of Donald J. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 4:26 am by Edith Roberts
’”At Casetext, David Boyle surveys the “’Christian’ amicus briefs” “either for Petitioners, Trump et al., or for neither party. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 11:50 am by William Ford
In light of Zuckerberg’s admission during congressional testimony that the company has a responsibility to use its tools for good, and his acknowledgement that “terrorist propaganda” constitutes “clearly bad activity,” the attorney seeks an order voiding Garaufis’s prior decision and reviving the case—Force et al. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 9:55 am by Jeff Welty
LaFave, et al., 2 Search and Seizure § 4.1(h) (5th ed. 2012). [read post]
24 Mar 2018, 7:35 am by Richard Hunt
J.U.T.A., Inc. et al,  6:17-CV-987ORL40KRS, 2018 WL 1305909 (M.D. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 4:58 am by Colby Pastre
To understand the import of this provision, some background may be useful. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 1:06 pm by William Ford
Robert Loeb and Sarah Grant argued that the decision of the Eastern District of Virginia in Al Shimari, et. al. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 10:30 am by Rick St. Hilaire
The University of Chicago no longer is in danger of losing ancient Iranian artifacts following Wednesday's United States Supreme Court decision in the case of Jenny Rubin, et al. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 2:38 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Richard Pinedo, et al (1:18-cr-24, District of Columbia) Richard Pinedo, of Santa Paula, Calif., pleaded guilty on Feb. 12, 2018, to identity fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1028. [read post]