Search for: "Washington v. USA" Results 281 - 300 of 1,570
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2016, 8:55 am
" Richard Wolf of USA Today reports that "Supreme Court denies class action lawsuit over false data. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 6:36 pm by Howard Bashman
” At the “Lawfare” blog, Justin Hendrix and Ryan Goodman have a post titled “A Conspiracy Theory Goes to the Supreme Court: How Did Murthy v Missouri Get This Far? [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:45 am
Washington, D.C. - The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit heard an appeal in the matter of Ineos USA LLC v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 2:30 pm by Joe Patrice
Second, someone in Washington has to be an adult and resist the urge to make stupid arguments just because someone might listen. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 2:34 pm by Kali Borkoski
Earlier today the Court issued a per curiam opinion in the Texas redistricting case, Perry v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
At The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket blog, Cori Alonso-Yoder discusses last week’s decision in Sessions v. [read post]
The Supreme Court’s Decision The Supreme Court dismissed the USA’s appeal. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
Washington comes from Gene Johnson at the Associated Press, Ariane de Vogue and Eli Watkins at CNN, Greg Stohr at Bloomberg, Richard Wolf for USA Today, and Lawrence Hurley at Reuters. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 9:01 am by Lyle Denniston
Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hold one hour of oral argument on a high-stakes legal battle between a brand-name drug company and a group of companies making generic drugs – Teva Pharmaceuticals USA v. [read post]
1 Oct 2022, 11:40 am by Larry
The case is Eteros Technologies USA, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 3:15 am by Amy Howe
News, this blog’s Lyle Denniston looks at Puerto Rico v. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
The first is Washington v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 7:50 am by Jay Willis
Florida, Sullivan v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 8:54 am by Joy Waltemath
The federal district court in Washington was not swayed by the employer’s assertions that it first offered the job at issue to a male over 40 and that the younger female replacement was actually given a different job than held by the employee (Holtz v Skanska USA, Inc, October 28, 2014, Bryan, R). [read post]