Search for: "Watkins v. State"
Results 281 - 300
of 533
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2008, 7:32 pm
Alabama legal sources said that attorneys for James Callahan, facing execution in that state at 6 p.m. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 8:31 am
Henry Watkins Skinner. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 8:36 am
Watkins et al. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 3:43 am
Edwards on behalf of the late Arthur Watkins v Hugh James Ford Simey Solicitors, heard 25 Jul 2019. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 8:04 am
In Watkins v. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 8:20 am
Edo, No. 06-100, and Safeco Insurance Company v. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 2:27 am
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 3:26 am
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 3:02 am
Last week IPKat was also delighted to host a guest post from Professor Lionel Bently (University of Cambridge) on the state of the debate around the proposed EU press publishers’ right: Sleepwalking towards a perpetual (news?) [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 10:00 am
EEOC v. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 7:36 am
State District Judge John Creuzot sentenced Mr. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
About 70 years later, SCOTUS moved away from this theistic definition in Torcaso v Watkins where it held that the Establishment Clause prohibits government from ‘aid[ing] those religions based on a belief in the existence of God as against those religions founded on different beliefs’. [read post]
3 May 2022, 1:39 pm
Background In March 2018, the United States Supreme Court held in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 4:46 pm
” Peak v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 4:21 am
At the Competitive Enterprise Institute, Devin Watkins writes that the court’s ruling in Gundy v. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 11:43 pm
See United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 3:50 pm
Ed. 2d 243 (2000); Watkins v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 6:22 am
Violating constitutional rights or exceeding the scope of the authorizing resolution could result in a legally unenforceable investigation or set of questions, See Watkins v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 9:15 am
” (Watkins v. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 3:08 am
Custody disputes between a natural parent and a third party are governed by Watkins v. [read post]
