Search for: "Weeks et al v. United States of America et al" Results 281 - 300 of 326
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2021, 9:05 pm by News Desk
Richard Ayvazyan, et al., in the Central District of California, eight defendants applied for 142 PPP and EIDL loans seeking more than $21 million using stolen and fictitious identities and sham companies. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: New record for international trade mark registrations in 2008 but signs of slowdown at year end and possible negative annual income (WIPO) (IP Frontline) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Law360) Chile and Peru join PCT (IP tango) (Patent Docs) (Managing Intellectual Property) (WIPO) Community trade mark fees to be reduced (Class… [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:59 am
Thus, we must reweave the torn fabric of rural America with thread strong enough to withstand the inevitable ravages of time. [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:52 pm
Charges filed by United Government Security Officers of America, Local 118; complaint alleged violations of Section 8(a)(1). [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 7:25 am by Jeralyn
The case is [2012] NZHC 2076 - The United States of America v Dotcom & Ors. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 10:58 am by Simon Lester
In the United States (US), as for most developed countries,[6] trade policy and IP standards have consistently been linked, a pattern which can (at least partially) be traced back to extensive lobbying by senior management at US-based technology and pharmaceutical firms.[7] For example, since at least the 1980s, Pfizer Inc. has been involved in mobilizing other US firms and stakeholders to lobby US policymakers on the issue of international IP protection. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
The CGFoE Prize for Excellence in Legal Services is awarded to the Human Rights and Indigenous Peoples Clinic at Suffolk University and the Association of Maya Lawyers and Notaries in Guatemala for their exceptional advocacy in the case of Maya Kaqchikel Indigenous Peoples of Sumpango et al. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 2:41 pm
References Bell BP, Goldoft M, Griffin PM, Davis MA, Gordon DC, Tarr PI, Bartleson CA, Lewis JH, Barrett TJ, Wells JG, et al., (1994). [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 9:48 pm
References Bell BP, Goldoft M, Griffin PM, Davis MA, Gordon DC, Tarr PI, Bartleson CA, Lewis JH, Barrett TJ, Wells JG, et al., (1994). [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:22 pm by Bill Marler
References Bell BP, Goldoft M, Griffin PM, Davis MA, Gordon DC, Tarr PI, Bartleson CA, Lewis JH, Barrett TJ, Wells JG, et al., (1994). [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 1:25 pm by rainey Reitman
Xavier Becerra and United States of America v. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:01 am by John Elwood
Amgen Inc., et al., 15-1039 and Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm by admin
The company has agreed to pay a civil penalty of $310,000, of which $155,000 will be paid to the United States and the other $155,000 to Virginia. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 9:01 am by Jeffrey Mitchell
We expect a slew of award announcements in the coming weeks. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 4:45 am
(Chairman Schaumber and Member Liebman participated.) *** United States Postal Service (15-CA-17767, et al.; 352 NLRB No. 115) Destin, FL July 31, 2008. [read post]
3 May 2009, 2:31 pm
This Leadership Council has decided that the ABA should come in 100% against the civil rights community, every consumer rights organization in the United States, and a variety of other public interest organizations, and be 100% on the side of the American Bankers' Association, the cell phone industry, and similar groups. [read post]