Search for: "Wells v. State of California"
Results 281 - 300
of 12,239
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2023, 7:55 am
This spring, a panel of the Ninth Circuit issued a ruling in California Restaurant Association v. [read post]
16 Dec 2023, 9:36 am
As is well known among state constitutional scholars, the states have held more than 230 constitutional conventions since the Founding. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 1:13 pm
OCT is the group behind the Juliana litigation, in addition to several cases brought against states in state courts. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 12:17 pm
Already on the docket for that term was Fulton, California v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 8:17 am
United States came on a list of orders released on Wednesday morning. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
The diagnosis is codified by several states, including the California legislature under its Health and Safety Code as “a medically serious, sometimes fatal, matter affecting newborns and very young children,” and is generally prosecuted as a form of child abuse. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 3:00 am
—Herb Denenberg, former Commissioner of Insurance for Pennsylvania 1Jarrett v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 7:50 am
NetChoice and NetChoice v. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 3:39 am
Susan V. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 1:30 am
Laws The California Privacy Protection Act, as amended by the California Privacy Rights Act, was the first comprehensive privacy law in the United States to reduce the data-minimization principle to codified law. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 6:05 am
This cohort includes well-known figures such as Jeffrey Clark, John Eastman, Jenna Ellis, Rudy Giuliani, Sidney Powell, and L. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 12:55 am
First, it included a choice of law clause (cl 1): ‘[A]ny and all disputes between Carrier and any Guest shall be governed exclusively and in every respect by the general maritime law of the United States without regard to its choice of law principles … To the extent such maritime law is not applicable, the laws of the State of California (U.S.A.) shall govern the contract, as well as any other claims or disputes arising out of that relationship. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 5:29 pm
As SCOTUS explains in Plyler v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 9:22 am
California-related matters — she should have been disqualified from this one as well? [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:15 am
Thus, with its order of July 11, 2023, it allowed an appeal to proceed (see case C-93/23, EUIPO v Neoperl). [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:14 am
Thus, with its order of July 11, 2023, it allowed an appeal to proceed (see case C-93/23, EUIPO v Neoperl). [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 6:31 am
It also improves access to justice for society as lawyers can handle more cases, as well as remove some bias from the legal system through fact-first drafting. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm
In Alabama v. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 2:29 pm
Ass'n v. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 8:45 am
In fact, in the case Bungie, Inc. v. [read post]
