Search for: "Wilkinson v. State" Results 281 - 300 of 405
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2024, 1:48 am by INFORRM
Wilkinson was separately represented and argues that Ten, as her employer, should cover her legal costs. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm by NL
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a request for an oral… [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm by NL
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a request for an oral… [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 2:56 am
This question arose before the England & Wales High Court in Barthelemy v. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 7:29 pm
Parliament enacted a provision for compensating victims of crimes, with a clause empowering the Secretary of State to bring it into force. [read post]
16 May 2023, 12:57 pm by Phil Dixon
Judge Wilkinson concurred, agreeing that the matter should be tried before a jury, but writing separately in support of qualified immunity. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 1:52 am
This is consistent with the approach to art 39 adopted by Lord Browne Wilkinson and Lord Goff of Chieveley in the House of Lords in R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate; Ex parte Pinochet Ugarte [No 3] [2000] 1 AC 147; [1999] UKHL 17. [read post]