Search for: "Will Thomas v. State of Indiana" Results 281 - 300 of 575
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2013, 1:25 pm by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
Indiana passed Act 1482, which increases the list of convictions eligible for expungement. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 7:14 am by Steven Gursten
Snyder used in his press conference: SPIN: Auto insurance prices in Michigan are exorbitant when compared to the prices in neighboring states, such as Illinois, Indiana, Wisconsin and Ohio. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am by Benjamin Coates
These territories (present-day states of Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin, and part of Minnesota) were essentially colonial possessions of the United States, and some American politicians favored treating them as such. [read post]
4 Dec 2012, 12:19 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
In the Indiana County case of Simms v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 12:26 pm by jleaming@acslaw.org
The case involved the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule, where the EPA was trying to regulate the amount of pollution states could dump on other, “downwind” states. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 9:30 pm by Kali Borkoski
 In 2009, in Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
That both the federal and state governments would coerce plaintiffs to flout such profound and fundamental beliefs seems totally at odds with repeated declarations of the Founding Fathers.A press release from the Thomas More Society announced the filing of the lawsuit.Meanwhile, two more Christian colleges filed suit in an Indiana federal district court challenging the federal mandate. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 6:13 am by Rob Robinson
Goan – http://bit.ly/OkMJum (Venkat Balasubramani) Factual Material Considered by Expert Is Discoverable Despite Expert Witness Amendments - http://bit.ly/LuCGRb (Gregory Joseph) Failure to Issue a Written Litigation Hold Not Necessarily Fatal - http://bit.ly/LKUv36 (Thomas Tobin) Five Guidelines for Completing the Best Document Review Project – http://bit.ly/PA7xAZ (Jonathan Easton) Google’s Privilege Claim: A Cautionary Tale… [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 9:01 am by Eugene Volokh
We had seen this before in some past Confrontation Clause cases, such as Hammon v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 7:44 am by Calvin Massey
  Indiana law requires that assessments of the type initially imposed be imposed equally, and Allegheny Pittsburgh Coal Co. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 11:47 am by Lyle Denniston
Kennedy, Sonia Sotomayor, and Clarence Thomas. [read post]
25 May 2012, 12:05 am by Ken
Kimberlin’s Rule 35 motions have also been denied, United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 12:10 pm by Tom Lamb
  Justice Clarence Thomas delivered the opinion of the Court, concluding that federal drug regulations applicable to generic drug manufacturers directly conflict with, and thus pre-empt, state law claims (see, in particular, pages 4–14 and 17–20 of this Pliva v. [read post]