Search for: "Williams v. Does 1-100" Results 281 - 300 of 460
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2013, 12:00 am by Kevin LaCroix
 The comments in this article are those of the author and do not represent the views of White and Williams LLP or any of its clients. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm
Nor had the Supreme Court yet ruled in United State v. [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 8:00 pm
: (IPKat),Spare part design protection: the European Parliament's view: (IPKat), (Catch us if you can)Cyprus fails to delight Turkey -  Cyprus is to gain PGI recognition for Turkish delight: (IPKat),Mewsings on the word ‘technical' (What does the EPO mean when it uses the word ‘technical'?) [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
Wiretap Act (also known as Title III) prohibits the interception of a live communication (e.g., a telephone call) only if the interception occurs in the United States; it does not prohibit or regulate wiretaps (interception) conducted abroad.[8]  Similarly, the U.S. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 8:33 pm by Kurt R. Karst
First, FDA notes that the Agency is “currently working to enhance our Third-Party Review Program, which was reauthorized under MDUFA V. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm by Marty Lederman
As Judge Williams of the Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 1:31 pm by SteinMcewen, LLP
§102(a).[24] As an illustration of how this might represent a change, lets look at the facts in Motionless Keyboard Co. v. [read post]