Search for: "Williams v. North Carolina" Results 281 - 300 of 700
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2018, 12:31 pm by Theodore Shaw
Chambers Distinguished Professor of Law and Director of the Center for Civil Rights at the University of North Carolina School of Law at Chapel Hill. [read post]
22 May 2019, 1:43 pm by Shea Denning
The post To Prove Aggravating Factors for DWI in Superior Court, State Must Provide Notice appeared first on North Carolina Criminal Law. [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Rosemond is not a licensed psychologist in Kentucky, but holds a master’s degree in psychology and is licensed as a psychological associate in North Carolina. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 6:00 am by Joseph L. Hyde
  North Carolina statute divides the crime into degrees – it’s first-degree if the home is occupied – but otherwise retains the common law definition. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 6:29 pm by Zachary Spilman
Three felonies a day is bad enough, now I have to worry about a dereliction charge if I go to the North Carolina Museum of Art and photograph a work of art on loan to the museum? [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 9:24 am by Phil Dixon
The post News Roundup appeared first on North Carolina Criminal Law. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 3:00 am by SOG Staff
The post News Roundup appeared first on North Carolina Criminal Law. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 8:28 pm by Joseph L. Hyde
A North Carolina statute of 1837 created no new offense, but codified the penalty for any person who shall ravish and carnally know any female of ten years or more by force and against her will or who shall unlawfully and carnally know and abuse any female child under the age of ten years. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 3:51 pm by Jon Sands
North Carolina, 428 U.S. 280, 305 (1976)). [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 2:47 pm
Deborah Gerhart, University of North Carolina School of LawConsumer Investment in Trademarks: Why it Deserves More in Fair Use ReturnsAbstract | Paper She's beginning a project on the following idea: The corporate owner of the mark is not the sole master of its meaning; it's important that consumers get some control reflecting their investment in TM meaning. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 7:20 am by Amy Howe
But the theory made an appearance in a concurring opinion by then-Chief Justice William Rehnquist in Bush v. [read post]