Search for: "Williams v. Powers" Results 281 - 300 of 4,127
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
William Brewer, Sarah Rogers & Noah Peters of Brewer Attorneys & Counselors and I filed a petition earlier this month asking the Supreme Court Second Circuit to review the Second Circuit decision in NRA v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 11:10 am by Michael Oykhman
Rather, as indicated in the case of R v Dinardo, [2008] S.C.C, the sexual element of touching can arise from circumstances other than the manner in which the victim was touched. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 2:56 am by INFORRM
On the same day, there were hearings in the cases of 2 Wakefield Limited v Persons Unknown, Clarke v Rose and Wolverhampton City Council v Kevin Poole. [read post]
18 Mar 2023, 8:03 am by Guest Author
In that regard it is akin to the power to remand a rule without vacating it. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 12:00 pm by Gary Corn, Melanie Teplinsky
Entitled “Combating Ransomware: One Year On,” the paper was drafted in consultation with leading experts in the field: V. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 1:41 am by INFORRM
On 1 March 2023, judgment was handed down in Bukhari v Bukhari [2023] EWHC 427 (KB) by Steyn J. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 3:51 pm by Amy Howe
(William Hennessy) Kagan interpreted the HEROES Act very differently. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:47 am by INFORRM
On 20 to 23 February 2023 Heather Williams J heard the trial in the case of Hay v Cresswell. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
”  Moreover, as Justice William Douglas said in his concurrence “since the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment a State has no more power than the Federal Government to use a civil libel law or any other law to impose damages for merely discussing public affairs and criticizing public officials. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm by Norman L. Eisen
On Thursday, the DC Circuit Court of Appeals held a hearing on whether Rep. [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Uddin, Religious Liberty Interest Convergence, 64 William & Mary Law Review 83-168 (2022). [read post]
18 Feb 2023, 9:45 am by Eugene Volokh
Williams, 553 U.S. 285 (2008), builds on this principle: "Offers to engage in illegal transactions are categorically excluded from First Amendment protection," id. at 297 (citing Giboney v. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 4:30 am by Lawrence Solum
In the Curse of Bigness, Wu rejects the consumer-focused account of the Sherman Act articulated in Standard Oil v. [read post]