Search for: "Windsor v. United States"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,003
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
The opinion’s unprecedented application of heightened scrutiny to a peremptory strike of a juror who was perceived to be gay bears significant implications for the same-sex marriage debate and for other laws that may give rise to distinctions based on sexual orientation.Indeed, today’s opinion is the only appellate decision since United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 10:07 am
The Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 12:00 am
Sebelius, which sustained critical provisions of the Affordable Care Act, and United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 4:00 am
Evans to United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 7:17 am
With this decision, accompanied by the defeat of DOMA in United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 11:57 am
Perry and United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 4:47 am
Briefly: In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes observes that although, “[a]s smart as they are, Supreme Court justices sometimes falter when they predict the consequences of their decisions,” Justice Antonin Scalia’s predictions on same-sex marriage – made in his dissent in United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 10:46 am
The state of same sex marriage might be in flux in Texas but federal law, following the Supreme Court decision in 2013’s United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 1:55 pm
Perry, and twenty-six topside amicus briefs (not including that of the Court-appointed amica) have been filed in the DOMA case, United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 9:19 pm
Windsor, striking down a federal law denying benefits to married same-sex couples.* Exactly 12 years ago to the day, Justice Kennedy's decision in Lawrence v. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 5:44 am
He acknowledged, for starters, that the Supreme Court’s 5-to-4 decision striking down part of the Defense of Marriage Act, United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 6:05 am
United States [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 2:38 pm
’” Then, relying upon the Supreme Court’s brand-new decision in United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 1:16 pm
The CFPB noted that this guidance was issued in response to the decision in United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 2:44 pm
The trial court recently held the law unconstitutional on the grounds that after United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 10:24 am
As a result, it was arguably harder for Justice Kennedy to make United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
On Feb. 22, the Justice Department filed a merits brief (full text) in United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 6:44 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8), and United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 5:42 am
Supreme Court's recent Windsor decision, as well as its earlier decision in Roemer v. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 6:11 am
” The guidance stems from a Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
