Search for: "Windsor v. United States"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,003
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2015, 9:55 am
Virginia decision arose from a criminal action appealed from a state supreme court, and the 2013 United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 8:52 am
Evans and continuing through his recent opinion for the Court in United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 3:13 am
This suggests that Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, and Samuel Alito – all of whom voted to uphold the discriminatory Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 2:51 pm
According to Sixth Circuit, the man-woman marriage laws in these states did not violate the Fourteenth Amendment—even in the wake of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 1:37 pm
And his opinion for the Court in United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 12:31 pm
Also significant is the Sixth Circuit’s correct understanding of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 12:30 pm
Perry, but to strike down Section 3 of DOMA as unconstitutional in United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 4:19 pm
The Louisiana district court judge was one of the few in the country since United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 1:17 pm
In the wave of court rulings following the Supreme Court’s July 2013 ruling in United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 8:51 am
Windsor in late June 2013. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 12:27 pm
Wade, and United States v. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 9:00 am
This rule is in response to United States v. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 9:00 am
This rule is in response to United States v. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 9:00 am
This rule is in response to United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 10:42 am
The decision cites to Judge Friedman's ruling in the DeBoer case as well as the seminal case on federal benefits: United States v Windsor. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 8:00 am
Windsor Ins. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
Last year, in United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 11:40 am
On December 12, 2014, CMS published a proposed rule to revise selected conditions of participation (CoPs) for providers, conditions for coverage (CfCs) for suppliers, and requirements for long-term care (LTC) facilities to conform with the Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 9:45 am
Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 9:45 am
Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
