Search for: "Word v. Lord"
Results 281 - 300
of 2,054
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2020, 3:42 pm
“Tool Without A Handle: Spirituality, Virtue, and Technology Ethics” "If one loves righteousness, whose works are virtues,She teaches moderation and prudence, righteousness and fortitude, and nothing in life is more useful than these. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 4:43 pm
Their reaction to the post is impressionistic and fleeting’ (Lord Kerr, para. 44; see also Monir v Wood [2018] EWHC 3525, [90] Nicklin J). [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 1:45 am
Lord Burrows gave the sole judgment. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
(the key word here being still). [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 7:27 am
Lord Justice Flaux, from the English Court of Appeal, and Mr. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 12:17 pm
Paris v. [read post]
27 Sep 2020, 7:08 am
The case at issue was an opposition to an application of a mark combining the sign “V” with words “Valentino Rudi” by the Italian high end fashion company Valentino. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:05 pm
Lord Sumption JSC explaining at [19] that, the rule originated in the division between the functions of judge and jury, the question of libel or no libel being exclusively for the jury. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am
The constitutional right to one’s reputation would be of little value if a person defamed were to be deprived of redress because the defamer honestly but unjustifiably believed that the person to whom the words were published had a right to receive the communication. [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 10:32 am
A recent interesting instance can be found in the decision delivered by Justice Bakhru of the Delhi High Court in the case of Monsanto v. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 3:58 am
Twenty years later, in Johnson v Gore Wood & Co [2002] 2 AC 1, the Court of Appeal purportedly (in the words of the Supreme Court yesterday) followed the Prudential decision, reiterating the Foss v Harbottle rule and holding that a shareholder cannot sue for the recovery of a diminution in the value of his shares or in distributions, where that loss flows from loss suffered by the company and that company has a cause of action to recover… [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 5:15 am
In layman’s terms, pseudolaw is pure nonsense.AVI v. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 12:21 am
Although Lord Carnwath (in line with the dissenting opinions of Lord Sales and Lady Arden) disagreed with Lord Wilson’s view that the scope of the Guidance is limited to “purely procedural or operational matters”, he stated that this did not open the door to “the delineation of the functions of central government in relation to the fund”. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 5:13 am
The unanimous judgment was given by Lord Kerr (former Lord Chief Justice of Northern Ireland), with whom Lady Black, Lord Lloyd-Jones, Lord Kitchin and Lord Burnett agreed. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 12:18 pm
The UK Legal Approach The starting point for construing contracts of all kinds under English law is well settled and was succinctly expressed by Lord Neuberger in Arnold v Britton [2015] UKSC 36; [2015] AC 1619, at paragraph 15 where he said: “When interpreting a written contract, the court is concerned to identify the intention of the parties by reference to “what a reasonable person having all the background knowledge which would have been available to… [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 11:31 am
Lord Justices Floyd and Arnold disagreed on the inventiveness of expandable hoses. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 4:19 pm
The facts of Richard v BBC [2018] EWHC 1837 (Ch) help demonstrate this. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 9:40 am
Koppelman has made one, and I will join him – with just a few small differences – here.To assess Koppelman’s claims, I am going to return to Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 4:28 pm
The judge found that the words complained of made defamatory allegations of fact. [read post]
