Search for: "Young v. Holder"
Results 281 - 300
of 390
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2011, 3:00 pm
Maples v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC sets strict standards to establish inequitable conduct: Star Scientific v R J Reynolds Tobacco: (Hal Wegner), (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (more from Patently-O), (Philip Brooks), (Law360), (I/P Updates), Safe harbour ruling in Io v Veoh could help YouTube in Viacom… [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 6:00 am
at 128, citing Fetahu v New Jersey Tr. [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 6:00 am
at 128, citing Fetahu v New Jersey Tr. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 9:03 am
That’s why she is specifically concerned about transferability of rights—young actors (even minors) w/o bargaining power who will transfer their rights away. [read post]
26 Aug 2023, 4:05 am
ItalyCasaPound v. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 7:00 am
Holder and Rucho v. [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 1:42 pm
Holder by effectively putting a stop to the preclearance process. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 2:24 am
This is the question young IP researchers hear most during their first years in the academia. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 9:57 am
On their part, Penguin said "we take our copyrights and trade mark rights very seriously - not least around our Ladybird brand, which has been developed over many years to help very young children read".This might help your child read EnglishBack in March we said that it was "interesting to consider what difference will the new UK planned exception for parody and pastiche will add to this scenario - from this blogger's perspective certainly an arguable defence". [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 3:47 am
Readers might for instance recall the recent judgment in Sekmadienis Ltd v Lithuania [Katpost here], in which the ECtHR considered that a prohibition to use in advertising the image of Jesus and Mary on grounds of public morals should be regarded as an undue compression of the applicants' own freedom of expression under Article 10 ECHR. [read post]
26 May 2020, 6:25 am
Gascon v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:06 am
(Pamela Samuelson’s Commentary on UMG v Augusto and Vernor v Autodesk) Vernor v Autodesk (EFF Amicus Brief in Key Case re First Sale and Contracts, Following UMG v Augusto) MDY v Blizzard (Justia) A Mixed Ninth Circuit Ruling in MDY v Blizzard: WoW Buyers Are Not Owners – But Glider Users Are not Copyright Infringers (EFF’s Commentary on MDY v Blizzard) Capitol Records v ReDigi (Wikipedia) Court’s… [read post]
2 Jun 2018, 1:01 am
Holder, 570 U.S. 2 (2013). [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 8:29 am
Arizona in Dickerson v. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 12:07 pm
Fix your mistakesJackson v. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 11:45 pm
Margaret Atwood on creativity (Michael Geist) National Graduate Caucus on copyright reform (Michael Geist) Supreme Court dismisses auto parts resellers' leave to appeal in action seeking expungement of trade marks for non-distinctiveness and abandonment: Hyundai Auto Canada v Cross Canada Auto Body Supply (West) Ltd & Ors (Canadian Trademark Blog) 'Why copyright? [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 7:06 am
To paraphrase only slightly Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 10:11 am
Kentucky v. [read post]
