Search for: "Akins v. State"
Results 2981 - 3000
of 3,091
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2009, 10:31 am
The Court of Justice of the European Communities handed down its decision in Case C-385/07 P Der Grüne Punkt-Duales System Deutschland GmbH v European Commission, supported by Vfw AG, Landbell AG and BellandVision GmbH, nearly 26 months after the ruling of the Court of First Instance which this 198 paragraph decision upholds.For those whose memory may not instantly recall the decision of 24 May 2007 or the facts that led to it, let the IPKat recap ...The German… [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:24 am
Instead of veering towards such a transformation, the government decided to rely once again on its preferred model, stimulating growth through investment, exports and subsidies to state-owned enterprises (SOEs), operating outside of China on a regional scale, via BRI. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 5:59 pm
Their comments are premised on the presumption that AHIs are caused by a malign state based capability being deliberately applied against American human targets in various overseas and domestic locations. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:32 am
Winter was coming, as it does. [read post]
28 May 2020, 1:11 pm
Thus, in Enigma Software Group USA v. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 5:19 am
It would be a user right.Originality v. novelty - copyright and patent. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 1:48 pm
From Tuesday's decision by Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall in Elliott v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:02 am
96/09 P Anheuser-Busch v Bud? [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 10:12 am
Lebowitz asks the court to impose the remedy that was proposed on Monday under United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 12:02 pm
Q: Garcia v. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 5:00 am
An analogous dynamic is described in the famous Delaware Chancery case, Smith v. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 1:40 pm
(OFCCP v. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 2:36 pm
The Delaware Supreme Court confirmed in Zapata Corp. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:07 am
Over at the Volokh Conspiracy, my colleague Randy Barnett, who's representing the private plaintiffs in the ACA case, has written a post focusing upon Justice Kennedy's expressed concern that in order for the Court to uphold section 5000A of the ACA, it might have to issue what Randy calls an "unbounded" opinion, one that would permit Congress to require the purchase of virtually any product--an outcome that Justice Kennedy fears would “change the relationship of the… [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 1:44 pm
Round Two: rehearing by the AHRC; an appeal from the AHRC’s 2020 decision (Amir and Siddique v. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 12:58 pm
There are state specific laws on the subject which varies from state to state. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
In this ruling, in Nelson v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 7:00 am
Circuit’s exacting standard of review in Business Roundtable v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 10:58 am
As originally introduced, the FSA would have equalized the treatment of crack and powder[7]—which is precisely what is done in the great majority of states.[8] Although powder cocaine sentencing provides the most natural benchmark to assess the proportionality of crack sentencing, it is not the only benchmark that should be borne in mind. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 7:02 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
