Search for: "American Express Co."
Results 2981 - 3000
of 4,918
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2013, 12:43 pm
Boehner and other top House Republicans have expressed a preference to break up the immigration issue and address the various aspects, such as potential legalization for the young undocumented immigrants known as “dreamers,” one at a time rather than in one far-reaching piece of legislation. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 9:22 am
Earlier this year, in American Express v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 8:44 am
From Mullenweg: [T]he quintessential American idea is equality of opportunity, the idea that there is a level playing field. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 3:43 am
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., No. 13-1405, 2013 U.S. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 6:36 am
Noah Webster, An American Dictionary of the English Language (1828). [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 6:27 am
” (his term), quite often, divorce litigants are so blinded with anger that they cannot be thankful for the things that they should be thankful for, much less, express thanks. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
Although the couple broke up when Bree was young, and one of the woman began dating men, they continued to co-parent Bree. [read post]
Employee’s 25-year-old theft conviction inadmissible but similar acts of coworkers might show intent
25 Nov 2013, 6:42 am
On the other hand, Allstate was precluded from presenting evidence of the employee’s conviction for theft in 1988 (Rideout v Allstate Insurance Co, November 20, 2013, Mills, M). [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 6:41 am
The wife expressed open antipathy for the husband’s attorney. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 12:13 pm
[The intended use regulation] provides that “intent is determined by such persons’ expressions or may be shown by the circumstances surrounding the distribution of the article”. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 10:15 am
Co-chairs Reps. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 9:49 am
This is in contrast to claims of co-ownership, which accrue only once, when “plain and express repudiation of co-ownership is communicated to the claimant. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
Within the specific context of DOMA, the assertion gave opponents the ability to argue for passage of the law on grounds of federalism—to stop Hawaii’s purported ability to export its national marriage policy to sister states over their ardent objections—rather than having to assume an express anti-gay-rights or even a pro-traditional-marriage platform. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 11:06 am
It reads: Core American principles ranging from the right to privacy to the right to petition our government are at stake. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
The question in the case is, instead, whether certain believers can co-opt the government to carry their message to the American people. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 12:16 pm
Precedents that make this clear can help diminish the chilling effect of trademark law on constitutionally protected expression. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 8:00 am
The Court rejected the argument that the Supreme Court's recent decision in American Express Corp. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 4:20 pm
Also quite notable is his expression of what freedom of religion meant to him. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 6:31 am
Finally, the court analyzed the Supreme Court’s recent holding in American Express Co. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
ENDA’s express purpose is to fill the existing gap in federal anti-discrimination law for gays, lesbians, and transgender individuals. [read post]
