Search for: "BEENE v. BEENE"
Results 2981 - 3000
of 191,977
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2009, 3:02 am
Yesterday, we started to discuss Waggoner v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 8:41 am
The Explanatory Notes refer to Thornton (cited above) and Jameel v The Wall Street Journal Europe Sprl [2003] EWCA Civ 1694. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 6:18 pm
New petitioners’ briefs have been added to the case pages for CSX Transportation, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 5:00 pm
The case is Stewart v. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 8:00 am
We have been closely covering historians' commentary on Obergefell v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 2:20 am
” WLR Daily, 14th July 2010 Source: www.lawreports.co.uk Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed. [read post]
11 May 2007, 2:38 am
R (Johnson) v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 2:55 am
Brazzill and others v Willoughby and others [2010] EWCA Civ 561; [2010] WLR (D) 140 “A segregated trust account was held on trust for all account holders of a bank in respect of whose deposits should have been made into the account in accordance with a notice served by the Financial Services Authority (‘FSA’) and was not limited to those account holders in respect of whose accounts payments were in fact made into the account. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 1:55 am
Laws v Metropolitan Police Authority and another [2010] EWCA Civ 1099; [2010] WLR (D) 254 “By reg 37(1) of the Police (Injury Benefit) Regulations 2006, on a review of an injury pension payable under those regulations, the only duty of the police authority was to consider whether, since any previous review, the degree of pension disablement had substantially altered, and it was not open to the authority to reduce or increase a pension on such a review by virtue of a conclusion that… [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 3:56 am
Connor v Surrey County Council [2010] EWCA Civ 286; [2010] WLR (D) 83 “A duty of care owed by a public body to one of its employees as a function of that employment relationship and which existed independently of the impact of action or inaction under statute could be violated, so as to give rise to a claim for damages, by failure to exercise a statutory discretion, but only where the discretion was, or would have been able to be, exercised consistently with the… [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 2:09 am
Regina (Conservative and Unionist Party) v Election Commissioner [2010] EWCA Civ 1332; [2010] WLR (D) 296 “It was not open to a petitioner to an election court to seek an order for costs under s 51 of the Senior Courts Act 1981 against the respondent’s political party and its local party association who had not been parties to the petition. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 11:34 am
Spirerose Ltd (In Administration) v Transport for London [2008] EWCA Civ 1230; [2008] WLR (D) 358 “In concluding that a valuation of the claimant's land on the basis that at the date of valuation there would have been a determined planning application granting permission , the Lands Tribunal had not erred. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 3:31 am
Stockton on Tees Borough Council v Aylott [2010] EWCA Civ 910; [2010] WLR (D) 216 “In determining pursuant to section 3A(1) of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 whether, for a reason which related to the claimant’s disability, he had been treated less favourably than a person to whom that reason did not apply, the appropriate comparator was someone who had acted in the same way as the claimant but did not suffer from his disability, and not someone to whom the… [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 2:03 am
R (Raissi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 72; [2008] WLR (D) 49 “The court was entitled to decide the meaning of a ministerial policy introducing an ex gratia compensation scheme. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 2:38 am
” WLR Daily, 13th January 2011 Source: www.lawreports.co.uk Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 2:06 am
Caldarelli v. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 11:44 am
I previously noted that the result in Briggs and Clay would have been different had they been tried today, due to the R.C.M. 912(f)(4) change designed to compel a different result in United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 8:23 pm
The petition of the day is: Citizens Against Reservation Shopping v. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 11:06 am
Here they are for the LRB v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 4:34 pm
The case of Gulati v MGN Ltd [2015] EWHC 1482 (Ch), to which the attention of this blog’s readers has already been drawn here, is a complex but important case. [read post]
