Search for: "Bare v. Bare" Results 2981 - 3000 of 5,021
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2013, 5:41 am by The Charge
  He relied on "the principles laid down in United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 8:08 pm by John W. Arden
Such bare allegations of fraud did not satisfy Rule 9(b)’s particularity requirement and did not sufficiently allege predicate acts of racketeering to state a claim under RICO, the court concluded.Further details will appear in RICO Business Disputes Guide. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 8:17 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
My family, like many others, was poor, barely scraping by. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 12:29 pm
 As it turns out, the revised plans had a value improvement of about 49.93%, which was just barely enough to get the project permitted.The contractor handled the job through Travis Bond (“Bond”), the designated on-site project manager. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 4:39 am by David J. DePaolo
That's when the control of a company's culture is removed from the executive suite and laid bare for societal review.The lesson for business is, emulate but be prepared for the consequences. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 9:10 am by Kevin
Probably the best-known case on this is Leonard v. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 2:58 pm by NL
I’m very interested to hear more about this challenge if anybody knows details.The other challenge that springs to mind is based upon Burnip v Birmingham CC, Trengove v Walsall MBC, and Gorry v Wiltshire C [2012] EWCA Civ 629 (Our report here). [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 2:58 pm by NL
I’m very interested to hear more about this challenge if anybody knows details.The other challenge that springs to mind is based upon Burnip v Birmingham CC, Trengove v Walsall MBC, and Gorry v Wiltshire C [2012] EWCA Civ 629 (Our report here). [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 6:41 am by Joe Mullin
The contract they struck with the R-J didn't transfer the whole copyright, a judge found; it merely transferred a "bare right to sue," which is not allowable under a legal precedent called Silvers v. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 3:57 pm by NL
He notes that in the bare wording of Regulation 8(2), “the phrase “deficiency or irregularity” is not qualified by any adjective such as “material” or “significant”". [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 3:57 pm by NL
He notes that in the bare wording of Regulation 8(2), “the phrase “deficiency or irregularity” is not qualified by any adjective such as “material” or “significant”". [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 10:44 am by Shouvik Kumar Guha
Gopika Murthy, to present a refreshing outlook on the copyright infringement and issues over terms of service relating to social media, as were highlighted in Agence France Presse v. [read post]