Search for: "Branch v. State"
Results 2981 - 3000
of 8,122
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2020, 8:01 am
(b) The suspension and limitation on entry pursuant to section 1 of this proclamation shall not apply to: (i) any lawful permanent resident of the United States; (ii) any alien seeking to enter the United States on an immigrant visa as a physician, nurse, or other healthcare professional; to perform medical research or other research intended to combat the spread of COVID-19; or to perform work essential to combating, recovering from, or otherwise alleviating the effects of… [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 3:08 am
Bus Co., 44 AD3d 628; Hoffman v Kessler, 28 AD3d 718). 3. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:23 pm
Chapter Readings· Marbury v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 7:56 am
In Citizens for Strong Schools, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
Raimondo and Relentless, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 4:11 am
"The text of the full decision is posted on the Internet at:[www.courts.state.ny.us]* Section 17 of the Public Officers Law provides for the defense and indemnification of employees of the State as an employer being sued in federal or state courts. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 11:06 am
”* Section 17 of the Public Officers Law provides for the defense and indemnification of employees of the State as an employer being sued in federal or state courts. [read post]
8 May 2014, 2:52 am
“This frivolous lawsuit caused unnecessary distraction of our executive branch leaders during a sensitive national security crisis. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 11:35 am
Apfelbaum, 445 US 115; People v. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 6:41 am
In striking down the so-called “Chevron deference” doctrine, the Court stated that it improperly prioritized the legal interpretations of the executive branch over those of the judicial branch. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 4:20 am
A similar dynamic occurred in the First Amendment context in 2010’s Holder v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 9:39 am
Supreme Court reviews a subsequent judicial taking case, should it simply step in for the state court in finding “what the law is” and, in appropriate cases, say that the state court was wrong, as is the case with conventional appeals within the judicial branch? [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 5:05 am
Due to a state of emergency declared subsequently in Thailand, and other difficulties, Tungkum was unable to perform its obligations under the Exports Contract, leading to the London branch granting it a ‘Holiday Period’ in consideration for a revision of the financing agreements. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 4:21 pm
Douglas, in Doe V. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 11:04 am
It helps to insure the traditional and important separation of democratic powers by disbursing political power to the several branches. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 9:45 am
In Trump v. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 4:30 pm
This absurd decision, Massachusetts v. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 10:00 pm
Supreme Court being held in a 7-2 decision (Justice Gorsuch and Chief Justice Roberts dissenting),Oil States Energy Servs. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 10:03 am
That explains why United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 8:43 am
Branch, 182 N.J. 338, 360 (2005) (quoting Riley v. [read post]
