Search for: "Clarence T."
Results 2981 - 3000
of 3,444
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2021, 10:46 am
Justices Clarence Thomas, Stephen Breyer, Samuel Alito, Elena Kagan and Brett Kavanaugh all pressed this point. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 7:12 am
Breaking into a car, boat, or airplane wouldn’t count. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 12:49 pm
” As Mademoiselle Dominique would say, “À bientôt. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 1:25 pm
If the new Justice analyzes the current state of minority electoral opportunity in the United States as did Scalia, the new statute probably won’t survive constitutionality. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 8:51 am
Yet everyone seemed to agree that wasn’t exactly true here. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 2:15 pm
Justice Clarence Thomas filed a concurring opinion in which he reiterated that, in his view, a method of execution only violates the Eighth Amendment’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment if it is “deliberately designed to inflict pain. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 9:54 am
But the Supreme Court – with only eight members after the death of Justice Antonin Scalia – didn’t resolve the dispute. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
Dep’t of Soc. [read post]
11 May 2012, 11:48 am
Apparently he hadn’t read many of my transcripts. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 9:53 am
Justices Stephen Breyer, Clarence Thomas and Gorsuch each authored one of these majority opinions apiece, in Marinello, Murphy and Patchak respectively. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 11:32 am
New Relists Was there something about the headline you didn’t understand? [read post]
13 Mar 2016, 9:01 pm
” She also said, when speaking at the Black Student Union, “I won’t apologize for what I did. [read post]
19 May 2017, 9:33 am
Who doesn’t want to take a quick break in the middle of work and go to Italy? [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 11:33 am
In this context, “bias” doesn’t mean prejudice or favoritism. [read post]
29 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
The short answer is they don’t. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 7:30 am
(It wouldn’t, it would just reduce it.) [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 9:00 am
The Supreme Court will hear oral argument on Tuesday in a case questioning whether a lawsuit seeking only symbolic damages can go forward after the government changes the unconstitutional policy being challenged, or whether the case is instead moot – that is, no longer a live controversy. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 1:16 pm
"This was a severely myopic law that didn't pass the smell test. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 1:13 am
The case, which an ABA representative calls a first of its kind, highlights the hazards for attorneys if they don't keep up with their clients' online activities. [read post]
23 May 2017, 1:43 pm
In fact, that is why Justice Clarence Thomas voted with the liberal justices to toss out these two districts. [read post]
