Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office"
Results 2981 - 3000
of 14,562
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2019, 3:00 am
Blockmon v. [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 12:23 pm
In January, the day before President Trump left office, the D.C. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 8:41 am
The FVRA provides the “exclusive means” of authorizing acting officials to perform duties of Senate-confirmed offices. 5 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 11:22 pm
See Swint v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 12:05 pm
Entities subject to the Open Meetings Law and the Freedom of Information LawMatter of Reese v Daines, 2008 NY Slip Op 51879(U), decided on September 15, 2008, Supreme Court, Erie County, Patrick H. [read post]
23 May 2022, 7:07 pm
The Fifth Circuit’s recent decision invalidating tenure protections for SEC Administrative Law Judges (“ALJs”) in Jarkesy v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:26 am
Argersinger v. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 2:07 pm
Khatchadourian v. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 12:38 pm
Rearden LLC v. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 12:45 am
Lord Justice Ward:"solicitors are officers of the court and if they are shown to have done wrong they should face the judgment of the court. [read post]
23 Jan 2022, 9:01 pm
Rather than following Chevron v. [read post]
25 May 2018, 3:12 am
Admitting evidence of prior disciplinary action taken against the charged partyOATH Index No. 2310/17Although the New York City Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings Administrative Law Judge Joycelyn McGeachy-Kuls ruled that evidence of prior discipline is not admissible to prove an employee engaged in the charged misconduct, she said that prior disciplinary events may be used to rebut employee’s testimony that he was unaware of work rules. [read post]
29 Dec 2012, 8:12 pm
On Friday morning, the Illinois Supreme Court answered "No," reversing the Appellate Court in Fennell v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 10:56 am
See Qualls v. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 1:40 pm
Zhang v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 10:43 am
As explained by the San Antonio Court of Appeals in Talamantez v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:02 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently issued a pair of decisions in the qui tam case Silbersher v. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 9:23 am
On September 16, 2020, the California Supreme Court granted review of Boermeester v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 4:13 pm
Boehner, indicating the Administration's decision not to further defend Section 3 of the Defense Against Marriage Act (DOMA) in two pending cases, Windsor v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:00 am
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Laurence L. [read post]
