Search for: "Davis, Appeal of"
Results 2981 - 3000
of 5,262
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2019, 10:36 am
Davis asks whether this Rule 59(e) motion should be considered as a second habeas petition. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 1:36 pm
Davis (Wednesday, Dec. 4): Whether and when a motion to alter or amend a judgment should be treated as a second or successive petition for habeas corpus. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 12:33 pm
The defendant appealed again. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 11:44 am
The argument also had been rejected by a federal appeals court in Cincinnati and the Ohio Supreme Court, with both courts ruling that he missed a deadline for filing appeals.... [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 10:30 am
Saul & Davis v. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 9:25 am
Davis. [read post]
3 Feb 2007, 4:57 am
The Court of Special Appeals issues dozens of unreported opinions. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 7:00 am
The sole issue on appeal was whether plaintiff was entitled to back pay. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 9:31 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled in favor of class action status for the case. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am
Rueda then timely filed his notice of appeal. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:01 pm
When the Supreme Court in Schuette v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
On the face of it, the idea has some appeal. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 11:12 am
Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
8 Apr 2017, 7:56 am
Davis wrote the five-page tribute, joined by Judge Henry F. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 4:04 am
Davis, 988 S.W.2d 370, 375 (Tex. [read post]
Eastern District of Texas bench/bar - Friday general sessions and breakouts on patent/criminal/civil
26 Oct 2012, 12:45 pm
Judge Jennifer Elrod, Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals; Deborah Pearce & Bryan DeTray, Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, Staff Attorney’s Office. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 2:41 pm
(Perhaps this meant to appeal to Thomas’s opinion of concurrence in M-D.) 1.3 If that fails, then they urge the Court to roll back to 1986 in Inadi (and really back to Roberts in 1980) in favor of the subjective “sufficient reliability” test and abandon the Davis rule (which they may do any way in Bryant), in favor instead of a notion that the applicable test should be whether or not it was generated in substitution of live testimony, then it would be testimonial… [read post]
9 May 2016, 6:30 am
These decisions are interesting, but until they make it through the appeals process they just might be flukes. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 7:55 am
The facts in Davis v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 11:27 am
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit affirmed the lower court’s decision and Vance appealed to the Supreme Court. [read post]