Search for: "Degree v. United States"
Results 2981 - 3000
of 6,520
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2011, 10:07 am
Costco, for the proposition that the first sale doctrine (§ 109(a)) "does not apply to items manufactured outside of the United States unless they were previously imported and sold in the United States with the copyright holder's permission. [read post]
4 May 2021, 4:23 pm
He wanted to lead an independent Lakota Sioux Nation, a juridical equal to the United States of America (and with no duty to take account of a subordinate entity like Montana or South Dakota). [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:02 pm
When the union fell apart, Monasky took A.M.T., their two-month-old daughter, from Italy to the United States. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 11:38 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 10:06 am
United States, and Printz v. [read post]
4 May 2017, 5:45 pm
Maryland, which, among other things, upheld Congress’s power to charter the Bank of the United States. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 3:04 pm
Ortiz v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 8:31 am
See United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:19 am
She was trial counsel for Romagoza v. [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 11:52 am
I am happy to announce the publication of my article: "A Lex Mercatoria for Corporate Social Responsibility Codes Without the State? [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 10:27 am
Susan Nelson said she represents a handful of teens and 20-somethings who should gain clearance to legally live and work in the United States under the terms of the policy change. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:00 am
Bensaid v. the United Kingdom (Application no. 44599/98, Feb. 6, 2001). [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 5:23 pm
Congress' commerce authority includes the power to regulate those activities having a substantial relation to interstate commerce as held in United States v Lopez. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 4:00 am
PUTTING THE WAR IN CYBERWAR: METAPHOR, ANALOGY, AND CYBERSECURITY DISCOURSE IN THE UNITED STATES Sean Lawson First Monday, Volume 17, Number 7 – 2 July 2012 [
Footnotes omitted; they are available in the original via the hyperlink above. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 3:42 am
Susan V. [read post]
8 May 2011, 3:25 pm
In Marzari v. [read post]
8 May 2011, 3:25 pm
In Marzari v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 5:07 pm
Relying on Matter of Campbell v Pesce (60 NY2d 165), the Court held thatAlthough the constitutional Double Jeopardy Clauses do not bar a second prosecution where the prior judgment of conviction has been vacated upon the defendant's motion or appeal because of an error in the proceedings (see Lockhart v Nelson, 488 US 33, 38; United States v Tateo, 377 US 463, 465-467), the 2003 judgment of conviction has never been vacated. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 9:50 am
District Court for the District of Columbia referenced my most-noted formulation of this principle in a foreign-cubed piracy case, United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 6:17 pm
This could result in destabilization and violence, jeopardizing national and international security to a new degree. [read post]
