Search for: "German v. German" Results 2981 - 3000 of 5,200
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2019, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
The German court held that this was a contractual issue; the contract of use between the Claimants’ daughter and Facebook was transferred to the heirs of her estate due to German Testacy rules. [read post]
20 Jul 2008, 4:15 am
Thus, we understood that the old German tradition of citizens owning guns had to end. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 6:21 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
This concerned, again, the EPO: Leading German patent law firms criticize European Patent Office. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 6:27 am
| German ‘hate-speech’ law tries to regulate Facebook and others - will it work? [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:18 am
publishers’ right in online publications |  German Court: TV show may not use ‘bloopers’ from other network without permission |  US Congress considers extending copyright term | Swedish ISP Telenor will voluntary block The Pirate Bay | You don't think that street names matter: Try telling your grandchildren that your fancy office is on "Crustacean Street" | Stay of injunction in public interest: Edwards Lifesciences v Boston |… [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 11:15 pm
 * Is German SEP litigation set to increase with the "confidentiality club decision"​ of the Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf? [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:17 am
: G 1/18, the decision | Coloplast v Salts: Should UK infringement proceedings be stayed if the patent has been opposed? [read post]
18 Oct 2022, 10:38 am by Florian Mueller
Then came OPPO, which after its withdrawal from the German market is not going to come under pressure soon--a nightmare for patentees--and which is also giving Nokia's world-class in-house and outside litigators a hard time:The first VoiceAge EVS v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 9:47 am by Olivier Moréteau
Legitimate Expectations in the Common Law WorldEdited by Matthew Groves and Greg WeeksThe recognition and enforcement of legitimate expectations by courts has been a striking feature of English law since R v North and East Devon Health Authority; ex parte Coughlan [2001] 3 QB 213. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 5:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
As Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote for a plurality in Hamdi v. [read post]
25 May 2018, 4:00 am by Ali Cooper-Ponte
The Right to be Forgotten The right to be forgotten (RTBF) came to prominence following the Court of Justice of the European Union ruling in Google Spain v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 9:47 am by Olivier Moréteau
Legitimate Expectations in the Common Law WorldEdited by Matthew Groves and Greg WeeksThe recognition and enforcement of legitimate expectations by courts has been a striking feature of English law since R v North and East Devon Health Authority; ex parte Coughlan [2001] 3 QB 213. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 10:55 am by Elina Saxena, Cody M. Poplin
In her visit to Beijing, German chancellor Angela Merkel suggested that the United States and Chi [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 9:46 am by Ben
Unauthorised sampling - the CJEU adds some clarityThe core issue in this all important case between the German electronic music pioneers Kraftwerk and and hip-hop producers Moses Pelham and Martin Haas in 1999 over the Sabrina Setlur song “Nur Mir”, which revolves around thse sample a two-second snippet of Kratfwerk's “Metall auf Metall” used as a loop was whether a license is required for sampling and could non-pursual of the same violate the phonogram… [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 1:30 pm
  The German medicines authority did not accept that MSD had filed a valid application until 13 February 2014 (another interesting inclusion, muses Merpel....). [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 2:59 pm by Mateusz Rachubka
Any assertion to the contrary is simply dishonest”.German Bundesgerichtshof ruled that WiFi Operators are not Liable for Copyright Infringement on their NetworksLast week, German Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof) ruled in the case involving an illegal download of a game ‘dead zombie’ that under the new German Telemedia Act, internet providers are not liable for copyright infringement via file sharing conducted by third parties on their network.… [read post]