Search for: "Jones v. United States" Results 2981 - 3000 of 3,760
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
I
7 Jun 2010, 8:25 pm by cdw
” David Wyatt Jones v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 8:49 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions   <> Asarco LLC v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 6:42 pm
Stuart Writes Opinion Piece for Dow Jones Daily Bankruptcy Review Written by Craig D. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 2:37 pm by Miriam Baer
 And yet, following the DC Circuit's decision in United States v Maynard (which eventually became United States v Jones when it was decided by the Supreme Court), individual jurists and scholars have increasingly embraced a mosaic theory of the Fourth Amendment, under which a discrete action (watching someone in public, seeking their phone records via a grand jury subpoena) becomes unconstitutional when government officials engage… [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 1:01 pm by Suzanne Ito
Pineda-Moreno, a Ninth Circuit case that could play a significant role in determining how broadly the Supreme Court's recent GPS tracking decision, United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 11:49 am by Danielle Citron
 The constitutional implications of mass quantities of data were at the heart of five Justices’ concurrences in United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
This controversial tool, which the Constitution says absolutely nothing about, is an example of an institutional rule that, for better or worse, has impacted constitutional development within the United States. [read post]
11 May 2012, 3:44 pm by Steve Honig
  In the last Bush Administration, the President’s legal office stated that the Federal government could share enforcement of Federal policy with the States, and that the States therefore could have concurrent authority. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am by John Elwood
United States, 13-1487, voluntarily turned over to the FBI fifteen firearms while unrelated marijuana charges were pending against him. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 9:48 pm
McKee claimed the act's release provisions were inadequate to ensure that only those persons with a current mental illness that makes them dangerous to the public continue to be confined.Citing Jones v. [read post]
5 May 2008, 4:52 pm by administrator
[xiii]  The federal civil rights statute is Section 1983 within Title 42 of the United States Code. [read post]