Search for: "LAWS v. DAVIS" Results 2981 - 3000 of 6,273
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2014, 6:00 pm by Colin O'Keefe
State of the Creative Series: Interview with the CEO & CCO at StrawberryFrog – New York lawyer Ronald Urbach of Davis & Gilbert on his blog, Madison Ave Insights The Defense Amicus Briefs Submitted To The SCOTUS In EEOC v. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 6:08 am
The DAO 21(a) report focused on a fact-pattern where the classic test for a “security” under federal law, announced in the Supreme Court’s 1946 case SEC v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 5:05 am by Diane Marie Amann
Sponsors, in addition to the journal and the law school, are the law school’s Dean Rusk Center for International Law & Policy, the Georgia Law Project on Armed Conflict & Children, the African Studies Institute of the University of Georgia, for which I serve as an affiliated faculty member, the Planethood Foundation, and the American Society of International Law-Southeast. [read post]
15 Sep 2024, 12:59 am by Frank Cranmer
In answer to a written question from Julia Buckley (Shrewsbury, Lab) to the Secretary of State for Justice asking “when her Department plans to publish a response to the Law Commission report entitled Celebrating Marriage: A New Weddings Law, published in July 2022”, the Parliamentary Under-Secretary, Alex Davies-Jones, said this: “We are aware that the Law Commission made recommendations for wholesale change of weddings law in July… [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
”  A state legislature’s constitutional inability to favor particular federal legislative candidates and disfavor others explains why the Supreme Court held a dozen years ago in Cook v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 1:56 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Moreover, where a trial court sets a specific deadline for expert disclosure, it has the discretion, pursuant to CPLR 3126, to impose appropriate sanctions if a party fails to comply with the deadline (see MacDonald v Leif, 89 AD3d 995; Pirro Group, LLC v One Point St., Inc., 71 AD3d 654; Bomzer v Parke-Davis, 41 AD3d 522; Maiorino v City of New York, 39 AD3d 601) . [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 3:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Reargument was therefore properly granted because Supreme Court (McBride, J.) misapplied the controlling law in finding that plaintiff, without an expert affidavit, had sufficiently raised a question of fact (see Davis v Zeh, 200 AD3d 1275, 1280 [3d Dept 2021]; Cascade Bldrs. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 1:28 am
Summary of Decision issued September 11, 2009Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: Lamar Outdoor Advertising v. [read post]