Search for: "MATTER OF D S N" Results 2981 - 3000 of 5,778
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2015, 11:30 am
Aug. 21, 1986), aff’d mem., 916 F.2d 970 (4th Cir. 1990). [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 6:10 am
  As the judge explains in his opinion, “[o]n or about” October 20, 2013,Plaintiff performed a Bing search for the term `disk wipe,’ downloaded and installed `MiniTool Drive Wipe’ software onto the hard drive of her work computer, and ran the program to wipe files including folders entitled `D: E & R Infosys Termination,’ and `My New Role Lawsuit. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 7:44 am by Joy Waltemath
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Texas Department of Housing & Community Affairs v. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 5:25 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
The ARB dismissed the petition, noting that the ALJ’s decision would be the final decision of the Department in the matter. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 6:37 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  However, Thuan Phong agreed to discontinue these particular phrases and to sell under “BÁNH PHỞ SN XUẤT TẠI THᾺNH PHỞ MỸ THO” and “HỬ TIỀU SN XUẤT TẠI THᾺNH PHỞ MỸ THO. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 6:00 am
Matter of J-R-R-A-, 26 I&N Dec. 609 (BIA 2015); The Board held that in the context of an asylum application, if there are sufficient concerns regarding an applicant’s mental competency, the Immigration Judge should first follow the requirements for assessing mental competency found in Matter of M-A-M-, 25 I&N Dec. 474 (BIA 2011). [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
§ 7412(n)(1)(A)—to impose the requirements of these new rules on these utilities. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 6:51 am by Florian Mueller
And while I haven't analyzed this in detail, it's possible that Microsoft's best chance to defeat those patents would be to allege invalidity under § 101 in light of the Supreme Court's Alice ruling (abstract subject matter)--but such an interpretation of Alice would also affect countless Microsoft patents, including some rather important ones.If you'd like to be updated on the smartphone patent disputes and other… [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 11:10 am by Howard Knopf
The trial in that matter is set to begin on May 16, 2016 and is scheduled to last for 15 days, which is a rather long time for a trial in the Federal Court. [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 5:00 am by Andy
This follows a number of landmark cases including Wheaton v Peters 33 US (8 Pet) 591, 668 (1834), Banks & Bros v West Publishing Co 27 F 50 (CCD) Minn, 1886, right up to the case of the State of Georgia v The Harrison Company 548 F Supp 110 (N d Ga 1982). [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 5:56 am
The judge then went on to explain how the litigation arose:Ariel Chavan attests that in September 2006, [Cohen], then presenting by the name Jessica D. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 7:42 am by Sara DePasquale
The rules of evidence apply to adjudicatory hearings for A/N/D and TPR actions in North Carolina. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 11:11 am by Staley Smith, Quinta Jurecic
According to Foreign Relations Chairman Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) and ranking member Ben Cardin (D-Md), one of the documents pertained to Iran’s Parchin military complex and the other related to “a side agreement that Iran has with the IAEA [International Atomic Energy Agency]. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 11:26 am by Jennifer Canfield
  Citing Whalen and Nixon, the NASA majority “assume[d] for present purposes that the Government’s challenged inquiries implicate a privacy interest of constitutional significance. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am by Marty Lederman
 And so, here's a post devoted to catching up, in three parts. [read post]