Search for: "MATTER OF M J S" Results 2981 - 3000 of 4,908
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2013, 8:31 am
Perhaps the interior decorator is closer to the core of what truly matters than the corporate lawyer. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 2:20 am by Paul Rosenzweig
As Rafaella reported last night, President Obama went “all-in” on cybersecurity last night, marrying a substantive mention of cyber in his State of the Union address (I’m bitter about  that — I bet against it, which shows you how valuable my predictions are J) with the issuance of both an Executive Order and a Presidential Policy Directive. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
In its decision J 9/84 [4] the Legal Board of appeal explained that the main purpose of R 31 EPC [1973] was “to induce the applicant to limit the protection sought to a certain number of claims, in the first instance for the purposes of the European search”. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 2:58 pm by NL
The finding in Mr Gorry’s case might be particularly relevant here. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 2:58 pm by NL
The finding in Mr Gorry’s case might be particularly relevant here. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 7:12 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
Exceptions also apply if you’re a nonresident alien student, teacher or trainee in the U.S. temporarily on an “F,” “J,” “M,” or “Q” visa, and you have no taxable income. [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 6:36 pm by Elijah Yip
  So, a person using a telephoto zoom lens to snap pictures of J-Lo on the balcony of her home could be liable for invasion of privacy without having stepped foot onto J-Lo’s property. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 10:53 am
NEW YORK — Two American judges who’ve had vast experience with e-discovery matters shared some tips and wisdom for counsel during the morning plenary session at this year’s Legal Tech conference.United State Magistrate Judge Andre J. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
M.50 (“MCIA”) and declared that Mr. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
The Court explicitly recognises the applicability of Article 10 in this case : “La Cour rappelle que l’article 10 de la Convention a vocation à s’appliquer à la communication au moyen de l’Internet (..), quel que soit le type de message qu’il s’agit de véhiculer (..), et même lorsque l’objectif poursuivi est de nature lucrative (..). [read post]