Search for: "MATTER OF P S"
Results 2981 - 3000
of 18,876
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2010, 2:31 pm
Michaels (University of California, Los Angeles - School of Law) has posted Deputizing Homeland Security (Texas Law Review, Vol. 88, p. 1435, 2010) on SSRN. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 2:15 pm
First, putting the AI debate in a concrete legal context acts as a pragmatic Occam's razor. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 4:59 am
First, putting the AI debate in a concrete legal context acts as a pragmatic Occam's razor. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 2:21 pm
Satz (Emory University - School of Law) has posted Disability, Vulnerability, and the Limits of Antidiscrimination (Washington Law Review, Vol. 83, p. 513, 2008) on SSRN. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 2:14 pm
Michael P. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 9:05 pm
Where the objective of the auditor’s report is reasonable assurance, the sustainability report is only a matter of limited assurance.[25] U.S. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 2:00 pm
Supreme Court’s holding in the case of Patterson v. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
P’Ship v. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 5:05 am
"I think it's fair to say that a lot of people who passed these laws knew they were unconstitutional, and they did it anyway. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 9:14 am
Supreme Court’s holding in the case of Patterson v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 6:12 pm
The defendant’s arguments are clever and may stand up on appeal, but the general rule is that the owner of a public accommodation will be liable for ADA violations no matter how many layers of other entities are between it and the daily operations. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 11:17 am
The Court concluded that the letters were hearsay, as they were offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 5:34 pm
Thus, the defendant’s petition to overturn her suspension should be granted. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 7:21 pm
If you have questions about this or another related Illinois criminal or traffic matter, please contact Matt Keenan at 847-568-0160 or email matt@mattkeenanlaw.com. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 1:54 pm
If you have questions about this or another related Illinois criminal or traffic matter, please contact Matt Keenan at 847-568-0160 or email matt@mattkeenanlaw.com. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 6:00 am
An earlier treatise from the late 1940's is in Richard P. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 6:27 pm
What's the difference in this case from the others, and should it matter whether it's a private or public entity imposing a restriction? [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 8:02 am
"Wrote Esquire's Charles P. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 1:49 pm
That being the case, it couldn't be "exhausted" and therefore Lyft's plan might not come into play at all.Since Lyft's policy is now considered primary it shouldn't matter whether or not the driver's insurance steps up.Time will tell.Original content copyright © InsureBlog [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 4:30 am
The plaintiff alleged that the defendants did not have FDA clearance to sell the “knockoff” P-STIM devices, that the defendants misrepresented to the public that their product was cleared under the same FDA 510(k) number assigned to IHS’s P-STIM medical device, and that the defendants “otherwise misbranded their product in violation of federal regulations. [read post]
