Search for: "MATTER OF T L S" Results 2981 - 3000 of 9,093
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2019, 11:10 pm by Florian Mueller
"Elle est essentielle pour que l'article 17 de la directive adoptée hier puisse produire tous ses effets. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 10:00 am by Ray Dowd
L'Oreal USA, Inc., 406 F.3d 905 (7th Cir.2005) (holding no preemption where photo model asserted right of publicity claim against photo copyright holder).It is true that Defendant's videogame is a work of authorship entitled to copyright protection, see Midway Mfg. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 9:58 am
Mary’s Coll., 814 F.2d 986, 993 (4th Cir. 1987) [...].TecSec, at *12 (some internal citations omitted).Collateral Estoppel does Not Apply to a Rule 36 Decision Based on One of Two Alternate FindingsJudgment based on TecSec’s Failure of Proof was Independent of the Court’s Construction[T]he district court’s judgment was independently predicated on alternative grounds: TecSec’s failure of proof as to… [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 9:19 am by Jeanine Conley and Mackenna Mosier
Justice Scalia added that one good effect of Justice Breyer’s suggestion is that “it would make sure that the matter is important enough to occupy the president’s attention and is not so insignificant that an agency that just doesn’t want any whistleblower, doesn’t want any criticism of what it’s doing, can pump out these regulations. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 4:45 am by Jon Hyman
— from The EmplawyerologistWage & Hour McDonald’s Employees: Not Lovin’ It — from The L•E•Jer How Will Expansion of Overtime Eligibility Impact Small Business? [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 8:08 am by Juan C. Antúnez
The general trend in Florida is that third party beneficiaries of a lawyer’s legal services can sue the lawyer for malpractice — and it doesn’t matter that the beneficiaries were never your client, you had zero privity of contract with them, and you owe them zero fiduciary duties. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 10:35 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  The materials in question were clearly exempt from Illinois law, given its explicit provision that the statutory right of publicity didn’t apply to “use of an individual’s identity in an attempt to portray ... [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 6:57 am by Eugene Volokh
The Court completely ignores her, won’t allow her to talk, and immediately turns to her ex’s attorney and asks: “What do you want? [read post]