Search for: "MILLER v. STATE" Results 2981 - 3000 of 5,140
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2017, 4:28 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Council of State Governments’ Knowledge Center blog, Lisa Soronen discusses the recent cert grant in Benisek v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 3:55 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Concepcion - Hartford, CT lawyer Wystan Ackerman of Robinson & Cole on the firm's Insurance Class Actions Insider WWJD--United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
Resolved – IPSO mediation 08369-19 Miller v The Sunday Times, No breach – after investigation Resolution statement 07779-19 Wallace v Echo (Basildon), Resolved – IPSO mediation 07037-19 Foley v Mail Online, No breach – after investigation 06303-19 Hoy v Wisbech Standard, No breach – after investigation 06056-19 Baker v The Daily Telegraph, Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication 05072-19 Smith… [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 10:36 am by MOTP
   Section 254.004(a) of the Texas Estates Code provides as follows: (a) A contract executed or entered into on or after September 1, 1979, to make a will or devise, or not to revoke a will or devise, may be established only by: (1) a written agreement that is binding and enforceable; or (2) a will stating: (A) that a contract exists; and (B) the material provisions of the contract. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 6:11 am by Doug B.
  In a New Jersey case, a very different result -- the state supreme court held that the state’s constitution requires a warrant. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 1:11 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Rembar went on to defend Henry Miller’s Tropic of Cancer, banned in dozens of states and cities, and, building on his successes, represented G.P. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 7:25 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Upon receiving such a request, the court must " perform the delicate operation of fashioning a response which meaningfully answer[s] the jury's inquiry while at the same time working no prejudice to the defendant' " (People v Brewer, 118 AD3d 1409, 1413 [4th Dept 2014], lv denied 24 NY3d 1082 [2014]; see People v Miller, 288 AD2d 698, 700 [3d Dept 2001]). [read post]