Search for: "Marks v. United States"
Results 2981 - 3000
of 9,189
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2021, 4:09 am
The GDPR is an EU regulation that seeks to protect the privacy of EU citizens' personal data by limiting transfer of such information among EU member states as well as between EU countries and the United States. [read post]
25 May 2009, 5:18 pm
The State argues Neither the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution nor the doctrine of preemption obligate state courts to enforce an otherwise valid order of any United States Bankruptcy Court where such order is challenged under the successor liability law of the states. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 12:50 pm
Perry and United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 1:12 pm
The justices have agreed to decide the following issue: “Whether district courts, in determining whether the due process clause requires a state or local government to provide a post-seizure probable-cause hearing prior to a statutory judicial-forfeiture proceeding and, if so, when such a hearing must take place, should apply the “speedy trial” test employed in United States v. $8,850 and Barker v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 5:45 am
Before sentencing, however, defendant moved to dismiss the indictment on the basis of the United States Supreme Court's decision in R.A.V. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 2:53 am
The Topps Company, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 4:05 am
TBL Licensing v. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 11:02 am
Trade Marks GuestKat Nedim Malovic commented on the CJEU judgment in Ferrari SpA v DU, C–720/18 and C–721/18 concerning the scope of ‘genuine use’ in trade mark law. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 1:35 pm
The Kluwer Copyright Blog, therefore, explains potential challenges that may arise.The implementation of the CDSM Directive is taking place in all Member States. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 7:25 am
United States, the Court is considering whether the “recommendation” of a government attorney is intangible property that can be the subject of an extortion attempt under the Hobbs Act. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 5:58 am
Sanchez Valle, describing it as an “explosive” filing that “has inexplicably undermined nearly 70 years of the United States’ legal and political commitment about the status of Puerto Rico and the right of the people there to local self-government. [read post]
22 May 2010, 7:12 am
See United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 11:21 am
Casey and Bush v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 6:19 am
United States, a capital case in which the jury foreman made many calls to news organizations and two fellow jurors during the trial. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 1:27 pm
Shah whether he agreed that under United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 2:51 pm
Litigants can choose to resolve their disputes through the United States Patent & Trademark Office’s Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) or initiate an action in the Federal court system. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 9:32 am
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 6:12 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 2:33 pm
Its autumnal character--soft, yellowing, and progressing from drowsiness to sleep, marks a certain stage in the progress of people, and perhaps of states. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 2:00 am
Under the notice-and-take-down system all you have to do is complain to Google; if the company agrees that your complaint is valid, it will remove the offending ad.Adtext complaints remain available, and Google's Adtext policy will also change for the UK, Ireland (and Canada), just as it has already been changed for the United States. [read post]
