Search for: "Matter of Adoption of Doe" Results 2981 - 3000 of 19,656
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2021, 2:27 pm by Scott McKeown
  That particular legislative fix seems to be just a matter of time (as does some kind of permanent Arthrex fix) Back to the PTAB. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 2:08 pm
  Fiduciary Duties under the UPA   If a partnership agreement does not specify the limits, those duties are specified – and limited – by the UPA. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
While access makes certain types of alternative provisions less likely as a practical matter, it does not prohibit their use. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 6:19 am
Courts have typically found that limitations placed on a public officer or employee with respect to his or her disclosing matters of public interest violates the individual’s right of free speech.In contrast, prohibiting an individual from publicly discussing subjects or governmental decisions or actions involving matters of a personal interest rather than a public interest does not violate the individual’s constitutionally protected right of free speech. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 5:26 pm by Ronda Muir
Of course, while clearly a good attribute, what does empathy really have to do with ethical conduct in the end? [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
Does it matter, again, what kind of political community a jurisprude is addressing or serving? [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 11:49 am by Eugene Volokh
While OCR does not enforce the First Amendment, OCR has made clear that it will interpret the laws and regulations it does enforce, including those that prohibit discriminatory harassment, consistent with the First Amendment. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 2:32 pm by David Cosgrove
The content of such apparent authority is a matter to be determined from the facts. [read post]
24 May 2017, 4:17 am
” [§5.66]Does the taste of a cheese fall within such definition of 'work'? [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 2:57 am
The adoption of this unified law requires individual action of each of the Member States. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm by Mikhaila Fogel, Benjamin Wittes
Because whether one agrees with his view of the law (as does McCarthy) or recoils at it (as does Lederman), one thing attorneys general of the United States should certainly not do is make up facts. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
It rather reflects the applicant’s substantive right under A 76 to file a divisional application on an earlier application if the subject matter of the earlier application is “still present” at the time the divisional application is filed (see G 1/05 [11.2]). [read post]
5 Nov 2024, 10:14 am by Michael Geist
The government’s antisemitism handbook does not censor or restrict these views, no matter how wrong or harmful they may be. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 10:46 am
  Nor was there any evidence that the FDA had considered commercial competition in its adoption of the relevant regulations. [read post]