Search for: "Matter of David B." Results 2981 - 3000 of 3,124
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2007, 7:36 am
In court today, Snyder is represented by Stephen B. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 10:57 pm
Today, David Lat over at Above the Law hit the gold mine of "comment cluster F*#ks" (his term, not mine) when he opened a thread entitled "Do Law School Grades Matter? [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 3:40 pm
(b) Why the hell are people saying "holiday" instead of Thanksgiving? [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
Md.Oct. 10, 2006) (testimony of ContractualTeam B) .................................................................10Trial Tr., Evans v. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 11:53 pm
$5 Million Verdict Upheld in Infants' Tylenol Case The Legal Intelligencer A Philadelphia judge has upheld a $5 million verdict rendered over a 1-year-old's death allegedly due to liver failure from an overdose of Infants' Tylenol, in part because the judge said the makers of the over-the-counter drug filed a 29-point statement of matters in violation of Rule 1925(b). [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 4:44 pm
I argued that as a matter of both consequentialist knowledge and deontological culplability; this was disputed by many serious people, including the very serious moral and legal philosopher David Luban. [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 1:32 am
The Democrats will assent to our new American torture regime no matter how grotesque and outrageous the story gets, no matter to what degree the Department of Justice's integrity and independence were compromised.In short, the story is this: Jack Goldsmith left OLC before he could complete the "replacement" torture opinion. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 6:03 am
Representing Appellees (Defendants): David Evans and Brandi L. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 10:34 am
  In Lazarus' world, it seems Insurer B is expected to have selective amnesia and to overlook the risk factors surrounding a property so long as prior losses came to rest on Insurer A -- even though the likelihood of loss is exactly the same no matter which particular insurer is covering the property. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 10:34 am
  In Lazarus' world, it seems Insurer B is expected to have selective amnesia and to overlook the risk factors surrounding a property so long as prior losses came to rest on Insurer A -- even though the likelihood of loss is exactly the same no matter which particular insurer is covering the property. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 3:48 pm
  Interestingly, in negotiating the relevant carve-out to the MAE definition, Sallie Mae did not, or was unable to, include a materiality qualifier (i.e., "more adverse in any material respect"), an omission that, if included, arguably could have significantly increased Sallie Mae's chances of success in this matter. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 3:37 am
The amending legislation, the Patents Amendment Regulations 2007 (No. 1) (Cth), commences on 22 October 2007.Learn more about "what is required" from F B Rice & Co, and get more, official IP news from down under here.The USPTO's proposed rule changes on Information Disclosure Statements, currently under review by the President's Office of Management and Budget, seem to be heading in the opposite direction: Changes To Information Disclosure Statement Requirements… [read post]