Search for: "Matter of M C B" Results 2981 - 3000 of 3,550
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
First, the Commission rejects financial materiality as the touchstone for its disclosures,[4] and fails to offer in its place a meaningful intelligible limit to its disclosure authority.[5] The release explains that Congress gave “the Commission, which regulates dynamic aspects of a market economy,” “intentionally broad” authority to require disclosures on a wide range of matters, even ones that do “not directly relate to a company’s value and financial… [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 7:30 am by Sandy Levinson
   So I am a member of what I’m suggesting is her primary target audience, though it’s also true that I’m interested in comparative law as well. [read post]
23 Nov 2021, 3:58 am by Matthias Weller
– A Critical Overview of the Hague Preliminary Draft on Judgments”, Yearbook of Private International Law 17 (2015/2016), pp 1-31 Bonomi, Andrea; Mariottini, Cristina M. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 7:39 pm
RUSSIAN FEDERATION)___________ALLÉGATIONS DE GÉNOCIDE AU TITRE DE LA CONVENTION POURLA PRÉVENTION ET LA RÉPRESSION DU CRIME DE GÉNOCIDE(UKRAINE c. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am by Eugene Volokh
Briefly put, the statute repeats parts of the common law definition of defamation, see Restatement (Second) of Torts § 559, comment b, which the Alaska Supreme Court in Gottschalk v. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 6:19 am
"  In marked contrast, our corporate clients have had to be more nimble, finding ways to deliver more value to their increasingly globalized clients through (a) using technology to improve productivity and service quality; (b) developing new services and appurtenant pricing models; and (c) adapting to the changing work force through more flexible and creative hiring and professional development tactics. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 6:35 am by MBettman
R.C. 119.12(M)(court may affirm an order of an administrative agency if the order is supported by reliable, probative, and substantial evidence and is in accordance with law.) [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
” and in Schulte, 8th edition, 2008, para. 59, point 154 “… die Stellung als Einsprechender … [ist] eine jedem Dritten offen stehende prozessuale Möglichkeit. [read post]
2 May 2018, 1:10 am by Jelle Hoekstra
Notice of opposition was filed against the granted patent, the opponent requesting revocation of the patent in its entirety on the grounds of lack of novelty and inventive step (Articles 54(2) and 56 EPC and Article 100(a) EPC), lack of sufficiency of disclosure (Article 100(b) EPC) and added subject-matter (Article 100(c) EPC).III. [read post]
2 May 2018, 1:10 am by Jelle Hoekstra
Notice of opposition was filed against the granted patent, the opponent requesting revocation of the patent in its entirety on the grounds of lack of novelty and inventive step (Articles 54(2) and 56 EPC and Article 100(a) EPC), lack of sufficiency of disclosure (Article 100(b) EPC) and added subject-matter (Article 100(c) EPC).III. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 12:42 pm by Elliot Setzer, William Ford
Event Announcements (More details on the Events Calendar) Tuesday, February 4, 2020, at 10:00 a.m.: Governance Studies at The Brookings Institution will convene a panel of policy experts to discuss President Trump’s 2020 State of the Union address to Congress and the nation. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Directors as a matter of course should have robust information about the independence and aims of director nominees before recommending a vote for or against their candidacy.[5]  Once in possession of such information, directors “have a fiduciary duty to disclose to the shareholders the available material facts that would enable them to make an informed decision[.] [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 8:58 am by Robert Liles
NEW — Abusive ordering, certifying, referring, or prescribing of Part A or B services, items or drugs. 42 C.F.R. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 8:58 am by Robert Liles
NEW — Abusive ordering, certifying, referring, or prescribing of Part A or B services, items or drugs. 42 C.F.R. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 6:58 am by Mandelman
No one is pro-scammer, mind you… everyone hates the idea of a homeowner being scammed out of money when at risk of losing a home, or at any time, for that matter. [read post]